In article <1993Jan20.100717.18052@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au writes:
> I'm inclined to say the paper docs of the 2.0 GA release were sufficient - they > did their job (being to get the system up and running). If users are interested > in fine tuning or serious trouble shooting, let them attack the online manuals. >
> (and before anyone darts in with "What if you can't read the online docs due to > some bug/problem ?", I would point out that these online documents need not be > in INF format, and indeed the trouble shooting manual (at least) should be
> accessible from the OS/2 command line in a floppy boot situation.
Well personnally, I much prefer the DOS 5.0 / Windows 3.1 manuals then the
OS/2 2.0 leaflets. They are much more detailed and cover a lot of aspects
that can't be easily spotted in an online based documentation...
I for one, would definately welcome a well-written 600 page manual (like
the one included in Windows 3.1), that covers all the components / applets
of the OS/2 operating system. Not necessary to go in extremely great
details, the online doc is more appropriate for that.
