home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!nstn.ns.ca!cs.dal.ca!iisat!mkseast!dale
- From: dale@mkseast.uucp (Dale Gass)
- Subject: Re: Getting user/kernel CPU times for current process...
- Organization: Mortice Kern Systems, Atlantic Canada Branch
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:26:36 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.192636.4184@mkseast.uucp>
- References: <1993Jan17.143256.1671@mkseast.uucp> <1993Jan21.170810.7614@microsoft.com>
- Lines: 67
-
- alistair@microsoft.com (Alistair Banks) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan17.143256.1671@mkseast.uucp> dale@mkseast.uucp (Dale Gass) writes:
- >>I'm trying to find a way to for a proces to find out the the amount of CPU
- >>time (user and system if possible) that it (and it's children, if possible)
- >>have consumed.
- >
- >You'll find all this information available through the win32
- >registry APIs -
-
- Where exactly in the registry would this information be?? Where would
- it's location be documented? (I don't mind any lack of documentation
- if the information were in a place where I could find it with regedit...)
-
- > if you're debugging/disassembling any code today,
- >you'll find that we won't be using those APIs in future, and that they'll
- >go away.
-
- Well, between July and October beta's, a bunch of stuff that I was using
- moved/disappeared in the registry, so I'm not too confident of the undocumented
- registry items being more stable than undocumented API's...
-
- Such changes are certainly excusable in these early betas, but will (are?)
- these registry items documented anywhere eventually? Whether it's a
- registry item or an API, I seem to be on my own finding this information.
-
- > The full registry functionality was somewhat later to be
- >implemented, and so early utilities used APIs which are only
- >temporary - the great advantage in using the registry is that these
- >statistics can be gatherd for any process on any machine, local or
- >remote
-
- Hmmm. Between the July->October betas, I noticed what I think was a trend
- in the other direction:
-
- I was using the registry to grab information about users, such as
- their home directories, etc.. This I stumbled across in
- SECURITY\SAM\Domains\Account\Users\HomeDir, etc... (Things
- were a little screwy in the Reigstry format, though; sometimes
- the "type" field was used to hold the actual data; a bit
- disconcerting but not too hard to figure out...)
-
- In the October release, these registry entries have disappeared,
- and I see no equivalents... After a bit of digging, I found
- a suite of undocumented API's: LsaOpenPolicy(), LsaLookupSids(),
- LsaClose(), etc., etc... (Lsa is the "local security authority"
- according to a comment in winerror.h.)
-
- Now, I don't mind using a registry entry to get the same
- information that I can from the Lsa calls, but the info just
- doesn't appear to be there...
-
- So where can I find another user's home directory, script, etc., in a
- MicroSoft-condoned way??
-
- > [we don't document APIs which are going away and which we know to
- > be temporary, another great Microsoft tradition!] -- Alistair
-
- While this is certainly understandable, it is frustrating when the only
- way to access certain information (another user's home directory, for
- example) appears to be via undocumented calls. I don't mind undocumented
- API's for-internal-use-only, if there is a developer level point of
- access for that same information...
-
- -dale
- --
- Dale Gass, Mortice Kern Systems, Atlantic Canada Branch
- Business: dale@east.mks.com, Pleasure: dale@mkseast.uucp
-