home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!pluto.arc.nasa.gov!kpc
- From: kpc@pluto.arc.nasa.gov (k p c)
- Subject: Re: Lisp syntax beauty? (was Re: Why Isn't Lisp a Mainstream Language?)
- In-Reply-To: dfs@doe.carleton.ca's message of Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:54:19 GMT
- Message-ID: <KPC.93Jan22142048@zog.arc.nasa.gov>
- Originator: kpc@zog.arc.nasa.gov
- Sender: usenet@kronos.arc.nasa.gov (Will Edgington, wedgingt@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: zog.arc.nasa.gov
- Reply-To: kpc@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov
- Organization: NASA Ames Research Center AI Research and Aero Branches;
- Sterling.
- References: <1993Jan21.230642.18561@netlabs.com>
- <19930122162651.0.SWM@SUMMER.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- <dfs.727723285@noonian> <1jpi0sINN47q@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
- <dfs.727732459@kehleyr>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 22:20:48 GMT
- Lines: 5
-
- there are technical solutions to that problem, aren't there? i recall
- there being something called presto that would eliminate parts of lisp
- that weren't being used.
- --
- i'm open to comparing research career notes with other cogsci/cogneuro people.
-