home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!nott!bnrgate!bcars267!bcars267!emcoop
- From: emcoop@bnr.ca (hume smith)
- Subject: Re: Lisp syntax beauty? (was Re: Why Isn't Lisp a Mainstream Language?)
- In-Reply-To: dfs@doe.carleton.ca's message of Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:54:19 GMT
- Message-ID: <EMCOOP.93Jan22161006@bcars148.bnr.ca>
- Sender: news@bnr.ca (usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bcars148
- Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Canada
- References: <1993Jan21.230642.18561@netlabs.com>
- <19930122162651.0.SWM@SUMMER.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- <dfs.727723285@noonian> <1jpi0sINN47q@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
- <dfs.727732459@kehleyr>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:10:06 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <dfs.727732459@kehleyr> dfs@doe.carleton.ca (David F. Skoll) writes:
-
- And people have been arguing that Lisp is a very good general
- purpose language. A function that prints English names of numbers
- is a pretty special-purpose function!
-
- hmm... what makes a general purpose language? does providing lots of special
- functions have anything to with it?
-
- i think you can turn the argument around (classic usenet fashion) and say
- that functions that only print numbers in digits is pretty special purpose
- too. especially, functions that read and write floating point in base ten
- only (my personal beef - there's no reason it can't be done in other bases!).
-
- i think it's a nice little bonus feature. when do you ever use most of the
- functions in the UNIX C libraries? isn't it handy the one time in a hundred
- you need them - you can keep on truckin' instead of trying to figure out how
- to patch around the hole?
- --
- Hume Smith Honour sick and davey cris-cross
- hume.smith@acadiau.ca McTruloff sentimie
- emcoop@bnr.ca A parsnip inner pair threes.
-