home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!constellation!convex!convex!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!biosci!creare.com!gda
- From: gda@creare.com (Gray Abbott)
- Newsgroups: bionet.info-theory
- Subject: Re: Animate Nature and Noise
- Message-ID: <Pine.3.03.9301271426.J14804-b100000@spock.creare.com>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 19:12:28 GMT
- References: <9301271804.AA01175@net.bio.net>
- Sender: daemon@net.bio.net
- Distribution: bionet
- Lines: 29
-
-
-
- On 27 Jan 1993, Venkatesh Murthy wrote:
-
- > This subject is quite fascinating. Much of the ideas that Steve Block
- > talks about in that nice little review were presented in another review
- > by Bill Bialek in 1987:
- > ...
-
- > is interested. He claims that in a lot of sensory systems, the coding
- > is close to being maximally efficient given the noise and the statistics
- > of naturally occurring stimuli.
-
- This is what I always heard. The fully dark-adapted eye in humans can
- detect a single photon; if the ear were more sensitive, it would hear
- Brownian motion, etc. (I don't have ready references for either of these;
- they were widely accepted beliefs when I was working in perception.)
-
- The hair cells in the ear are really amazing, as they can detect
- displacements much smaller than their physical dimensions (smaller than
- most atoms). The theory I heard (several years ago) was that when the
- stereocillia bundle was moved, the shearing of the fibers against their
- neighbors opened ion conduction gates; small displacement could cause a
- significant shear. That seemed plausible, but I haven't read the
- literature in a few years...
-
-
-
-
-