home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!bcc.ac.uk!link-1.ts.bcc.ac.uk!ucakrvb
- From: ucakrvb@ucl.ac.uk (Vijay Bhuchar)
- Newsgroups: alt.messianic
- Subject: Re: Disproof of "Proof 2" (was *** MoJ: Proof 2: The Passover Prophecy ***)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.160835.35787@ucl.ac.uk>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 16:08:35 GMT
- References: <1jvcalINNouf@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
- Sender: news@ucl.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
- Organization: Bloomsbury Computing Consortium
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <1jvcalINNouf@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> friedenb@silver.egr.msu.edu (Gedaliah Friedenberg) writes:
- >
- >In article <1993Jan19.115444.28751@ucl.ac.uk> ucakrvb@ucl.ac.uk (Vijay
- >Bhuchar) writes:
- >>In the prophecy of the 70 weeks I said that the 360 day was only
- >>suggested this century and under this method Mashiach Nagid has
- >>to be revealed on Nisan 10, which is exactly what the New
- >>Testament says about Jesus.
- >
- >This has repeatedly been disproven on alt.messianic. You cannot use
- >invalid "facts" for part of a "proof". Please refer to all of the
- >previous posts on this topic for further information (including
- >"Disproof of 'Proof 1'").
- >:
- OH WHAT???? OH WHAT????
- I have all the files on the so called disproof of Proof 1 and as
- far as I can tell all you have come up with is casting aspersions
- on the use of the 360 day year and other pedantry like such.
-
- A disproof of this great prophecy would involve citing the subjects
- and dates of this prophecy - you have not done this because all the
- Jewish commentaries go with the versions involving Cyrus which I
- pre-empted so you dont know which way to turn.
-
- Please post up a proper refutation of proof 1 which involves
- typing out the fulfilment not haphazard aspersions.
-
- Thank you.
-
- Vijay
-