home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.irc:5116 alt.irc.recovery:384 alt.mud.lp:471 alt.mud:632 rec.games.mud:9253 rec.games.hack:8351 talk.bizarre:46720 alt.drugs:21527 soc.net-people:1703
- Newsgroups: alt.irc,alt.irc.recovery,alt.mud.lp,alt.mud,rec.games.mud,rec.games.hack,talk.bizarre,alt.drugs,soc.net-people
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!caen!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!newton.physics.uq.oz.au!kinsler
- From: kinsler@physics.uq.oz.au (Paul Kinsler)
- Subject: Re: Virtual Reality Addiction (Questionnaire)
- Message-ID: <C1JJK0.1nG@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au>
- Followup-To: soc.net-people
- Keywords: no statistical validity
- Sender: kinsler@newton.physics.uq.oz.au (Paul Kinsler)
- Organization: Physics Dept. The University of Queensland
- References: <C1HB6L.GnL@waterloo.hp.com> <C1IMoI.6qF@waterloo.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 01:45:33 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <C1IMoI.6qF@waterloo.hp.com>, hudel@waterloo.hp.com (Chris Hudel) writes:
- >> I (chudel@watarts.uwaterloo.ca) wrote:
- >> :[Survey about Virtual Reality Additions deleted]
- >> :[...]
-
- Just thought I'd point out that this survey will have almost no
- statistical validity whatsoever, except as an indication of
- what the sub-group of people who <have acess to USENET,
- and read this group, who respond to requests to surveys, who
- answer this particular survey becuase the aren't all that
- busy, ... etc>, think. Don't think the result need be in anyway
- indicative of what all "vr-users" really think.
-
- I have directed followups to soc.net-people to save bandwidth.
- ------------------------------+soluble fish+------------------------------
- "You people, you do not see the grandeur in the wind and stone and stars,
- in the blood and fire and iron - but paint only the flowers."
-