NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3/NN_1993_3.iso/spool/alt/flame/19253

Text File | 1993-01-24 | 5.2 KB | 115 lines

Newsgroups: alt.flame
Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU!jbl3g
From: [e-mail] (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Macho 1 - Women 0. Moana is down (for now...)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Organization: University of Virginia
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 03:13:29 GMT
Lines: 103

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>>>In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Moana Lombardi) writes:
>>>>>[e-mail] writes:
>>>
>WRONG! Sometime drivels are a LOT OF FUN, and there are many
>people that read alt.flame to HAVE FUN. And fun drivels are not
>necessarily "intelligent"...
True, your drivels are a lot of fun for us, because it gives us a chance
to completely humiliate you in alt.flame.  You are the one person, perhaps
in alt.flame history who has called his posts "drivel" with pride.  You
perhaps were looking to join alt.stupidity, eh?  There, drivel is widely
accepted.  You have proven expediently that your drivels are not intelligent,
thank you very much.


>>>And now for all the morons in this FUCKING NET:
>>>
>>>That is the proof that I did not want to continue the macho-
>>>war because it was getting to much hard for somebody *else*.
>>
>> Oh, believe me, on behalf of the net, it is never hard to deal with you.
>
>[1]> Maybe Moana can't take it,
>
>[2]>I felt she has done a pretty good job displaying
>
>Don't [1] & [2]  sound encoherent?

Only to a stunted, pusball like you.  To most of the civilised world, my
post was quite coherent.

>
>> you for the large mass of felchball that you are.  Obviously, she thinks
>> she needed to apologize.
>
>Lame. She also admited that *she did not succeded with me".
>Sorry.

She didn't succeed with you because she gave you too much credit for being
 a fully evolved human being.  Now that she knows you are a monkey-man,
she will have an easier time.

>>> I will never apologyze for nothing,
>> Maybe you will learn to spell?
>
>No way. I don't care. To write with my english is funny and
>teasing. I don't give this present to you, Jason.

Yes.  To be an illiterate must be funny and teasing, it makes you look
stupid as well.

>>
>>> instead to apologyze I raise the fire, even if I
>>>sound bad. I don't like to loose. I won. Sorry guys, shit
>>>happens, and I did not want to see such a bullshit.
>>
>> You are the living testament to the fact that shit happens.
>>
>WHOAAWAWAWAWWAWWWAW! Gooooood! Such a flame! My gosh, I am
>still laughing! Get a life, get a clue, learn how to tell
>Jokes! But what are you, a *drammatic* actor?!? I always cry
>when I read your lames, my God. I cry because I can't belive
>that there is somebody so boring as you are.

THE FLAME ANALYSIS
SUBJECT:  Little Michelina, ITA

Begins with a roar of laughter, or maybe pain.  Perhaps he has been stroking
himself the whole time, and has just jizzed all over the keyboard.  Next, he
compliments Jason.  Some examples are "Good", "Such a flame" and "My gosh, I
am still laughing."  Here he admits his appreciation.  Another possibility
is that he is using irony, but we all knows he doesn't know what that means.
Next, the meat of his flame: "Get a life.  Get a clue."  This indicates that
his wit resides within the mind of a fifteen year old.  Next he states: "Learn
how to tell jokes."  This opinion is rendered laughable because in context, the
fact is that he was unable to get the joke in the first place.  Immediately
ensuing is a question, to which the answer is yes.  Next, a confession, he
tells us a secret: "I always cry when I read your lames, my God."  This
indicates that Jason's flaming is too painful for him to endure without a heavy
amount of tears and a request for divine intervention.  He then claims
to cry because he "can't belive [sic] that there is somebody as boring as
[Jason is]."  We know this to be a lie, because we all know Michele knows
he is boring.

ANALYSIS:  This flame is sad even for a newbie.  Michelina demonstrates
almost zero originality, especially because the meat of his flame are two
tired, boring, high school sayings ("Get a life." "Get a clue.") While these
terms are acceptable as a flame introduction or closing statement, they are
pretty lame attempts to create a flame in and of itself.  The presence of
compliments, failed sarcasm, and rhetorical questions also weaken the effort.

EVALUATION:  Michele has the flaming capacity of a sea anemone.

>P.S.    Be a good boy, intellectual, I am tired to be
>    serious. The macho-war is over, now it is time to
>    joke. And since you are not able to do it, you will
>    lose.... Easy, no?

Once again, you admit you are tired...I thought you would give up.
By the way, we don't joke here, this isn't rec.humor.  If you pull
one of your "I was just joking" lames again, you will be the loser.