home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.flame
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!world!martin
- From: martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan)
- Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
- Message-ID: <C1Dq57.1MC@world.std.com>
- Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
- References: <1993Jan23.133840.1@udphvx.cineca.it> <1993Jan23.220140.6476@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1993Jan24.014023.1@udphvx.cineca.it>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:22:18 GMT
- Lines: 130
-
- In article <1993Jan24.014023.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
- >Sorry, Jason. I thought you had a mind, I discovered you are a
- >moron, and since I AM IN MISSION FOR *GOD*, I flame you, up
- >to the day that you'll die. Your fault, you are clueless.
-
- Thief. Remember when you id'd me at The World and you posted a lame about
- my plan:
-
- "To boldy fart where no man has farted before"
-
- "I'm on a mission from god"
-
- "Rifletette"
-
- Someday you will come up with your own stuff. Until then I give you
- permission to use my copyrighted flames. All except:
-
- Fuckwad (tm) (C) 1992 Martin J. Hannigan All Rights Reserved
- ^^^^^^^
- Remember when we FIRST met? This is how I described you then, and now.
-
- >In article <1993Jan23.220140.6476@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
- >> In article <1993Jan23.133840.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
- >>
- >> So let's clean that up. "To have a child can be the most wonderful
- >> experience for some women, but not necessarily for every woman."
- >
- >Those women are losers.
-
- The only reason you say that is because they are MicheleProof(tm) (C)
- and you're a big fuckwad (tm) (C) who can't take it.
-
- >>>
- >> This statement must be stricken. You have no way of proving I am cold to any
- >> one but you.
- >
- >You are cold because you are a moron. A woman that *decide*
- >to have not children IS cold. Defending them , you ARE cold.
- >>>
- >> I agree. Do you want to improve it? Wake up. Treat all human beings
- >> (including women) as equals.
- >
- >I do. Only speaking about rules and laws. I don't do it speaking
- >about sex and feelings. You know, I don't like to fuck guys.
-
- I thought you weren't going to lie anymore?
- >>
- >AND HERE, THE PROOF THAT YOU ARE CLOSE MINDED:
- >
- >> Guess what? If a woman loves her career, and realises that getting pregnant
- >> and having to raise a child would keep her from doing the thing she loves
- >> (her career) then I believe it is perfectly fine for her to opt not to
- >> have children. Someone else will have children, instead, I'm sure.
- >>
- >IDIOT, MORON, ASSHOLE, STUPID, COLD, FALSE *INTELLECTUAL*
- >GUY! You did not understand any fuck! You are clueless, you
- >belive on Santa Claus!
- ^^^^^^
-
- Whats a belive?
-
- >
- >THERE ARE *MANY* WOMEN THAT DECIDE TO HAVE NOT CHILDREN
- >BECAUSE THEY ARE *AFRAID* TO *LOOSE* THEIR JOB!!!!!!!!
- >
- >OK?!?!? Can you understand this?!?!? And that's NOT fair!
- >Jesus, you are an idiot.
-
- So now your back to your Pope on a rope gig?
-
- >
- >Anyway, you flame yourself.
- >
- >> It is not for me or you to decide what is best.
- >
- >There are women that think that to have a children is
- >something wonderful, (probably the most wonderful thing on
- >life) but they are not proud enough to make them because this
- >system DOES NOT LIKE THE MOTHERS THAT WORK! OK?
- >>
- >> No, it is not cold. I maintain, that it is not for me to decide. If I got
- >> married to an actress, and told her, now that we're married, you are going to
- >> have to give up acting and have a baby, THAT would be cold.
- >
- >That's your mistake. The big one. I was going to understand
- >that you thought only about actresses. You are wrong.
- >
- >============================================================
- >There are many women, with a regular job, that loose that
- >job JUST BECAUSE THEY GET MARRIED! It does not happens to
- >good actresses. I told you, your world is smaller than mine.
- >============================================================
- >
- >I can fall in love with an actress, I can love her all my
- >life, but IF she does not want to have children with me, I
- >make children with somebody else (I do not enforce her, boy).
- >But it is not a production of children, no. Probably, after a
- >while, I rather stay with the mother of my children than with
- >the sweet romantic actress. You *CAN'T* say that it is wrong.
- >I have the right to have children with somebody that I love.
- >>
- >> Yet you suggest that society would be a better place if women would put
- >> having children ahead of the rest of their lives.
- >
- >That's not what I suggest, moron. There are women THAT THINK IN
- >THIS WAY, but are not able to decide. You don't know a fuck
- >about women.
-
- I can guess by the fatness of your wife how happy you are. Tell me, is she
- a TubShitter (tm) (c) or just a plain old fat Italian cow who eats
- liguini all day?
-
- [NUMEROUS LAMES OMITTED]
-
- >> It is too bad that you have not witnessed the struggle of women, fighting
- >> to have those rights. Many already work and have families. Why
- >> don't you get your head out of your ass?
- >
- >Why do they have to be *enforced* to decide that?!?
- >They are, trust me.
-
- Oh, I get it, not only are you back on the Pope on a rope kick, but you
- are also net.pregancy.advisor (tm) (c) ?
-
-
- [MULTIPLE LONG WINDED, FAR FETCHED IGNORANT LAMES DELETED]
-
- Michele ---> F_U_C_K_W_A_D <--- (tm) (c)
-
-
-