home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.dads-rights:3484 soc.men:23202 soc.women:23016 misc.legal:23236
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!isc-br!tau-ceti!dogear!bobk
- From: bobk@dogear.spk.wa.us (Bob Kirkpatrick)
- Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights,soc.men,soc.women,misc.legal
- Subject: Re: Sexual Discrimination
- Message-ID: <12iwXB2w165w@dogear.spk.wa.us>
- Date: 24 Jan 93 22:01:59 GMT
- References: <C1D4KB.7Jw@cs.psu.edu>
- Organization: Dog Ear'd Systems of Spokane, WA
- Lines: 24
-
- beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
-
- > noraa@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (aaron.l.hoffmeyer) writes:
- > >
- > >Are the domestic relations courts of the US practicing sexual
- > >discrimination? If no, then everything is hunky-dory and we are all
- > >wasting our time, churning our wheels, whining and crying over
- > >nothing. If yes, then we have a moral imperative to ourselves, our
- > >children, their progeny, to society and to intellect itself to see that
- > >these wrongs are corrected.
- >
- > Very well-stated.
- >
- > But I've gotten the impression that the Supreme Court refuses to
- > hear cases having to do with "domestic relations." Is this so?
- > Can we hope that Clinton appointees will be more willing to hear
- > such a case?
-
- Only if new Associate Justice positions are added to the court, or if
- a current member dies or resigns during Clinton's administration.
-
- ---
- Bob Kirkpatrick <bobk@dogear.spk.wa.us>
- Dog Ear'd Systems of Spokane, WA
-