home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 53861 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-02  |  1.2 KB
  1. Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53861 alt.flame:17545 alt.fan.kevin-darcy:668
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!pan!keegan
  3. From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
  4. Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
  5. Subject: Re: Clarifying "Restrictions"
  6. Message-ID: <1993Jan2.145405.947@crd.ge.com>
  7. Date: 2 Jan 93 14:54:05 GMT
  8. References: <1992Dec30.000557.20083@watson.ibm.com> <1992Dec30.050611.25734@rotag.mi.org> <1992Dec30.200825.22596@watson.ibm.com> <1993Jan1.001959.29643@rotag.mi.org>
  9. Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
  10. Reply-To: keegan@crd.ge.com
  11. Organization: "T.S.A.K.C"
  12. Lines: 18
  13. Nntp-Posting-Host: pan.crd.ge.com
  14.  
  15. kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
  16. |>margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
  17. |>>I think "arguing for legislation while claiming he doesn't want it"
  18. |>>is the most descriptive I've seen yet.
  19. |>
  20. |>I don't argue for abortion restrictions. I argue only against certain
  21. |>absolutist positions. Learn the difference.
  22.  
  23. sure you do, kevin. you argue against women's right
  24. to terminate a pregnancy quite frequently.
  25.  
  26. you even argued that a consensus should be reached
  27. before some women would be allowed to terminate a
  28. pregnancy.
  29.  
  30. do your beliefs embarass you so much that you feel
  31. compelled to deny them?
  32.                
  33.