home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: still more of the GROUP, kevin darcy
- Message-ID: <1993Jan1.002219.29734@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <1992Dec29.191937.5513@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <=-22d2b@rpi.edu> <1992Dec30.043412.8538@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 00:22:19 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1992Dec30.043412.8538@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
- >In article <=-22d2b@rpi.edu> keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
- >>mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
- >>->[Over 40 lines of Kebbin defending himself as a group deleted]
- >>
- >>->Good Ghad Kebbin, this must really get under your skin, if you're
- >>->going to post that much junk about it.
- >>->You can think of yourself as a group if you want, I don't care. Just
- >>->try to avoid the psych boys when you're doing so.
- >>
- >>i don't really believe kebbie thinks of himself as a
- >>group. he simply needed to convince people that he was
- >>a group once in order to slither away from admitting he
- >>fucked up yet again. in the global scheme of
- >>kebbie-dialogue, this was just more of the same.
- >>
- >I don't really think he considers himself a group either, but isn't it
- >fun to watch him squirm?
-
- Are you here for rational debate, Mr. Cochran, or for "squirming"?
-
- - Kevin
-