home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 53818 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-01  |  1.0 KB  |  26 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
  3. From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
  4. Subject: Re: Clarifying "Restrictions"
  5. Message-ID: <1993Jan1.001959.29643@rotag.mi.org>
  6. Organization: Who, me???
  7. References: <1992Dec30.000557.20083@watson.ibm.com> <1992Dec30.050611.25734@rotag.mi.org> <1992Dec30.200825.22596@watson.ibm.com>
  8. Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 00:19:59 GMT
  9. Lines: 15
  10.  
  11. In article <1992Dec30.200825.22596@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
  12. >In <1992Dec30.050611.25734@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
  13. >>Would "limited pro-concensus" be sufficiently descriptive, you think?
  14. >
  15. >"Sufficiently vague" is more like it.
  16.  
  17. Superficial, Larry. Very superficial.
  18.  
  19. >I think "arguing for legislation while claiming he doesn't want it"
  20. >is the most descriptive I've seen yet.
  21.  
  22. I don't argue for abortion restrictions. I argue only against certain
  23. absolutist positions. Learn the difference.
  24.  
  25.                                 - Kevin
  26.