home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 53812 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-01  |  1.2 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!pan!keegan
  2. From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
  3. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  4. Subject: Re: Clarifying "Restrictions"
  5. Message-ID: <1993Jan2.003223.3588@crd.ge.com>
  6. Date: 2 Jan 93 00:32:23 GMT
  7. References: <1992Dec25.044506.4750@rotag.mi.org> <1992Dec28.020955.13604@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Dec28.190837.4545@watson.ibm.com>
  8. Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
  9. Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
  10. Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
  11. Lines: 12
  12. Nntp-Posting-Host: pan.crd.ge.com
  13. Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise
  14.  
  15. margoli@watson.IBM.com writes of kebbie:
  16. -> Mark, you must be confused.  Kevin keeps telling us that he is *not*
  17. -> arguing in favor of legislation.  (I'm afraid that I'm confused as well,
  18. -> since it sure looks to me like he's arguing for legislation, but there's
  19. -> probably a fine semantic point that we're
  20. -> overlooking.)
  21.  
  22. i doubt you're overlooking anything. i haven't seen
  23. kebbie argue for legislation. what i ahve seen him do,
  24. over and over, is make the same arguments that those
  25. who wish legislation make (while denying that he wants
  26. legislation, of couse).
  27.