home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!mcochran
- From: mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran)
- Subject: Re: Proposed definitions for FAQ (Was: Reconciling OT/NT)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan1.023433.25814@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
- of Denver for the Denver community. The University has neither
- control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
- Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account)
- Organization: None worth mentioning.
- References: <1992Dec29.033620.8746@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <nyikos.725744605@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <1992Dec31.131942.20519@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 93 02:34:33 GMT
- Lines: 50
-
- In article <1992Dec31.131942.20519@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
- >In article <nyikos.725744605@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
- >> In <1992Dec29.033620.8746@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
- >>
- >> >In article <nyikos.725582371@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
- >> >>In <1188@blue.cis.pitt.edu> sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
- >> >>
- >> >>>In article <1992Dec28.011822.12450@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
- >> >>>#In article <nyikos.725128086@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
- >> >>>##In <1992Dec22.063007.50924@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis) writes:
- >> >>>##
- >> >>>#
- >> >>>#[Riiiip]
- >> >>>#
- >> >>>##Susan Garvin is at least a candidate for the title "pro-abortionist,"
- >> >>>##along with everyone else who sneers at every report of wrongdoing
- >> >>>##by LEGAL abortionists while choosing to blind themselves to evidence
- >> >>>##that certain illegal abortions never took place.
- >>
- >> Mark, get your attributions right. Larry Margolis did not say the above.
- >> I did.
- >
- >Peter, why do you love so much to show us that you don't understand
- >how attributions work? Could it be, maybe, stupidity? Yes, I
- >rather think it is.
- >
- >If you look at the reference lines you will notice that the material
- >in question has one more character at the beginning of the line
- >than the appropriate reference to you. As those of us who have
- >actual functioning brains understand, the quoted material always
- >has one more character indicating it is quoted than the matching
- >reference. Here. Look at the top reference line. You will
- >notice that your reference does not have any character appended
- >to the line, but if you look at the material quoted immediately
- >above you will see it has one appended character. Is it getting
- >clearer, you stupid, stupid man?
- >
- I think you're wasting your time Dean. I just deleted all that crap
- from my reply to PHoney. I've given up any hope that he'll ever have a
- resonable understanding of attributions. Nor, do I think, will he ever
- give up whining that his false accusations against Susan were not his
- fault.
- In his case, I think we need to spell it:
- Stooopid Stooopid man!
-
- --
- Mark Cochran merlin@eddie.ee.vt.edu
- These are the views of my employer. They also represent the views of
- your employer, your government, the Church of your choice, and the
- Ghost of Elvis. So there.
-