home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!hemlock.cray.com!mon
- From: mon@cray.com (Muriel Nelson)
- Subject: Re: Abortion, Caves, Galen (WAS Vegetarianism and abortion)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec30.110127.29535@hemlock.cray.com>
- Lines: 29
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hemlock
- References: <C015K3.Ip4@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1992Dec29.175100.20873@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> <C01KMr.uK@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
- Date: 30 Dec 92 11:01:27 CST
-
- In article <C01KMr.uK@ra.nrl.navy.mil> psl@nrl.navy.mil (Paul Lebow) writes:
-
- [exchange with Dean about possible deaths due to abortion
- restrictions deleted.]
- >
- >Yes Dean I can support my assertion, I will provide you with excerpts from
- >a Planned Parenthood official, census data, a gynological journal. I
- >don't have them here, but I at least want to reply. I feel very safe in
- >assuming that no matter what statistic I have, you and a host of others in
- >this group can cast a negative spin.
- >
- >Even if you can come up with a conflicting set of statistics (and by THEN
- >I mean, prior to Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton), it still wouldn't change
- >the fact the the 'coat hanger/back alley ' ploy is a red herring. If I'm
- >wrong, I 'm not off by much, not enough to warrent the slaughter of
- >millions of children to spare the life of a relatively low number of women
- >who would choose to break the law.
-
- Thank you for making it so abundantly clear that
- you don't care if desperate women die.
-
- > This is the REAL issue. The sad part
- >is that the pro-aborts present as fact that thousands of women will surely
- >die if abortion is outlawed. There is nothing to support this whatsoever.
- >
- Anyone have the Brazil stats archived?
-
- muriel
- standard disclaimer
-