home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!stanford.edu!rutgers!sgigate!sgi!wdl1!bard
- From: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com (J H Woodyatt)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Pro-choicers must condone infanticide
- Message-ID: <1992Dec30.173859.6029@wdl.loral.com>
- Date: 30 Dec 92 17:38:59 GMT
- References: <1992Dec28.093545.11533@hemlock.cray.com> <1992Dec29.095118.21147@rotag.mi.org> <1992Dec29.111932.26271@hemlock.cray.com> <1992Dec30.005736.24210@rotag.mi.org> <1992Dec30.051334.12145@watson.ibm.com>
- Sender: news@wdl.loral.com
- Reply-To: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com
- Organization: Abiogenesis 4 Less
- Lines: 20
-
- margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis) writes:
- # kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- # >
- # >"Interference" refers to detrimental effects. It is not a violation
- # >of BA to have one's biological functions affected in beneficial ways.
- #
- # Someone whose religious beliefs forbid medical intervention might
- # not agree...
-
- Hell, I'm an agnostic and I definitely do not agree. The last thing I
- want is some agent of the State coming at me with a scalpel telling me
- my right to decide what surgical procedures are to be performed on me
- are nullified by the fact that it's for my own good.
-
-
- --
- +---------------------------+ ``Man has not a single right which is
- | J H Woodyatt | the product of anything but might.''
- | bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com | -- Mark Twain
- +---------------------------+
-