home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!mcochran
- From: mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran)
- Subject: Re: Clarifying "Restrictions"
- Message-ID: <1992Dec29.205111.8857@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
- of Denver for the Denver community. The University has neither
- control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
- Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account)
- Organization: None worth mentioning.
- References: <1992Dec25.044506.4750@rotag.mi.org> <1992Dec28.020955.13604@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Dec28.190837.4545@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 20:51:11 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1992Dec28.190837.4545@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
- >In <1992Dec28.020955.13604@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
- >>In the case in question,
- >>namely abortion, you are arguing in favor of legislation regarding
- >>abortion
- >
- >Mark, you must be confused. Kevin keeps telling us that he is *not*
- >arguing in favor of legislation. (I'm afraid that I'm confused as well,
- >since it sure looks to me like he's arguing for legislation, but there's
- >probably a fine semantic point that we're overlooking.)
-
- No doubt. The only thing I've been able to see is that Kevin is
- *constantly* arguing the side of logislation, without ever actually
- *proposing* any specific legislation. He apparently sees a difference
- between arguing in favor of legislation, and supporting that same
- legislation.
-
- --
- Mark Cochran merlin@eddie.ee.vt.edu
- These are the views of my employer. They also represent the views of
- your employer, your government, the Church of your choice, and the
- Ghost of Elvis. So there.
-