NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/talk/abortion/53223

Internet Message Format | 1992-12-28 | 3.0 KB

Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53223 alt.flame:17492
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!mcochran
From: [e-mail] (Mark A. Cochran)
Subject: Re: Clarifying "Restrictions"
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
    of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
    control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Sender: [e-mail] (netnews admin account)
Organization: What's that?
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 20:29:08 GMT
Lines: 51

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
>>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
>>>[e-mail] (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
>>>->[e-mail] (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
>>>->>[e-mail] (Mark A. Cochran) writes to
>>>->>kebbie:
>>>->>->I'm game... Lets hear you explain the difference between a fantasy and
>>>->>->a hypothetical situation which has NO basis or cantact with the real
>>>->>->world.
>>>->>
>>>->>i can see you need to review some history, particularly
>>>->>kebbie's explanation of the GROUP kevin darcy and the
>>>->>INDIVIDUAL kevin darcy.
>>>
>>>->You mean Kebbin thinks he's a group? He has Multiple Personality
>>>->Disorder, or what?
>>>
>>>it wasn't all that complex. when kebbie was addressed,
>>>specifically by name, he claimed that a group was being
>>>addressed. it was one of those funny and sad things
>>>that kebbie does frequently. it seemed to me that it
>>>was one of those semantics games he plays to avoid
>>>admitting to a mistake which many readers saw him make,
>>>which is why so many people have teased him about it
>>>ever since then.
>>>
>>>you might have something similar developing with him in
>>>another thread, you know.
>>>
>>Wonderful. I know I once suggested to Kebbin that he let his
>>"contacts" at UMMC check his brain, but here we have it...
>>Further evidence that if they do, we'll lose him. I don't think they
>>have net access from the Psych Ward...
>
>Mark, you've allowed yourself to be flim-flammed by yet more propaganda.
>All you need do to dispel this odor of ignorance is to ask yourself "Does
>the term 'Kellmeyer and Darcy' denote a group, or an individual?". Assuming
>you pick the correct answer, then the ignorance dissipates, and all is well
>again.
>
I would say that it denotes two individuals. One named Kellmeyer and
one Darcy. As for all being well again...
Does this mean you did let one of the psych types at UMMC check you
over?

--
                  Mark Cochran          [e-mail]
These are the views of my employer. They also represent the views of
your employer, your government, the Church of your choice, and the
Ghost of Elvis. So there.