home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!galen.med.Virginia.EDU!gjh
- From: gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis)
- Subject: Re: Darcy and viability as important dividing line.
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.173956.24228@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
- References: <1992Dec27.225912.15810@rotag.mi.org> <34655@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> <1992Dec28.163431.18194@rotag.mi.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 17:39:56 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1992Dec28.163431.18194@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org
- (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-
- }Before viability, I would oppose all attempts to restrict abortion, purely
- }on Constitutional grounds. After viability, I would allow the legality of
- }"normal" abortions to be decided by popular mandate. So, you see, although
- }I don't happen to support any abortion restrictions, viability is still a
- }crucial dividing line for me.
-
- Uh, this crucial, important dividing line. When is it? How can it
- be detected? Can doctors detect it? Can hospitals? Can you detect
- it at home? At whose definition of "viability" would you begin to
- allow abortion restrictions, not support, just allow?
-
- Ya know, when Kevin _really_ starts drinking, I have to slam the
- toilet lid on his head. Hayuck, hayuck.
-
-
- TTTTTTTTTT SSSSSSSS AAAAAAAAA K K CCCCCCC
- T S A A K K C
- T S A A K K C
- T SSSSSSSS AAAAAAAAA KK C
- T S A A K K C
- T S A A K K C
- T SSSSSSSS A A K K CCCCCCC
-
-