home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gossip.pyramid.com!olivea!spool.mu.edu!think.com!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!newsfeed.rice.edu!rice!news.rice.edu!patrick
- From: patrick@blanco.is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: More Bare-Fased Lies from the Reverend:
- Message-ID: <PATRICK.92Dec27094849@blanco.is.rice.edu>
- Date: 27 Dec 92 15:48:49 GMT
- References: <34625@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> <1992Dec24.181531.5792@ncsu.edu>
- <34633@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> <1992Dec26.222823.13078@rotag.mi.org>
- Sender: news@rice.edu (News)
- Distribution: na
- Organization: Irrelevant. We've been assimilated.
- Lines: 28
- In-Reply-To: kevin@rotag.mi.org's message of Sat, 26 Dec 1992 22:28:23 GMT
-
- In article <1992Dec26.222823.13078@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-
- In article <34633@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> smezias@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU (Stephen J. Mezias) writes:
- >
- >I'll happily stand on my net reputation for lying versus yours.
-
- I'll happily stand the validity of most "net reputations" against truth
- anytime.
-
- ...at least, until the reputation approaches the truth a little too closely.
-
- If there didn't exist people like our dear TSAKC who spend virtually all of
- their posting time trying to fabricate people's "net reputations", then maybe
- "net reputations" would be a useful yardstick, Stephen. But with all the
- context-cutting, misdirection, obfuscation, and outright LYING that these
- folks do, do you really think that the resulting "net reputations" are worth
- a damn? They are tainted by the obvious vendettas of the people that create
- and sculpt them.
-
- In other words, they're no good because YOU didn't create them -- classic
- "do as I say, not as I do", it looks like to me. At least you're
- consistent, kebbin. :-)
-
- --PLH, people that think two wrongs make a right -- enjoy their antics while
- they're around...
-
-
- --
-