home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: Pro-choicers must condone infanticide
- Message-ID: <1992Dec27.131733.14752@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <1992Dec25.191318.19916@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Dec26.221418.12870@rotag.mi.org> <1992Dec27.011244.12829@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 13:17:33 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1992Dec27.011244.12829@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis) writes:
- >In article <1992Dec26.221418.12870@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org
- >(Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >
- >}No misconceptions.
- >
- >Er, you expressed some idea about what happens in hospitals, and
- >to what degree risk can be established, etc.
-
- I expressed no ABSOLUTE degrees, Galen. I only compared pregnancy to the
- burglar-in-the-night scenario. Unless you are trying to tell me that
- the risk-predictability/controllability/safety of the burglar-in-the-night
- situation is comparable to the risk-predictability/controllability/safety
- of pregnancy, then I see no point in continuing this discussion.
-
- > [diatribe about Darcy being the most evil force in the universe, deleted]
-
- Try decaffeinated, Galen.
-
- - Kevin
-