home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53035 soc.men:21829 alt.dads-rights:3111 alt.abortion.inequity:6192
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rutgers!ub!dsinc!cs.widener.edu!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!nocsun.NOC.Vitalink.COM!wetware!drieux
- From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,soc.men,alt.dads-rights,alt.abortion.inequity
- Subject: On this Father's Rights Issue
- Message-ID: <1992Dec25.214508.14803@wetware.com>
- Date: 25 Dec 92 21:45:08 GMT
- References: <1992Dec24.120127.1918@zooid.guild.org> <w0X9VB1w165w@dogear.spk.wa.us>
- Sender: news@wetware.com (Usenet News Account)
- Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
- Lines: 38
-
- bobk@dogear.spk.wa.us (Bob Kirkpatrick) writes:
- ]
- ] Pardon me, but it seems that this discussion has moved away from the
- ] issues of the rights of fathers to their children. Perhaps this may
- ] have a better forum elsewhere.
-
-
- just catch me up here bob, I may have missed it in the flow,
- but is your argument that a father has a 'right' over that
- which is not yet?
-
- like unto this, do you feel that outlawing abortion will
- resolve the problem of "father's and their children" in any way?
-
-
- As a child of a Pre_Roe.v.Wade Divorce in which my father
- gained custody of the children, by mutual consent, I've noticed that
- the change in the abortion laws have NOT radically altered
- the general pre_disposition of courts, and socity, to presume
- that the father is the Ikky Yukky.
-
- From the recent row over the 'pre_sex contract' it seems clear
- that there are still women out there who are more than willing
- to play the game of "If I get pregnant I am going to hang you
- out to dry Sucker...."
-
- So I thought I would request that you please clarify what
- position you would prefer.
-
- ciao
- drieux
-
-
- --
- Modern Day Problems:
-
- This is Not a .sigfile addendum to the Post.
- You are just reading beyond the edge.
-