home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 53012 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-25  |  1.4 KB
  1. Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53012 alt.society.civil-liberty:7056 alt.rush-limbaugh:12288
  2. Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.society.civil-liberty,alt.rush-limbaugh
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
  4. From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
  5. Subject: Re: Pro-choicers must condone infanticide
  6. Message-ID: <1992Dec25.034713.4354@rotag.mi.org>
  7. Organization: Who, me???
  8. References: <BzEy8s.7x8@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <nyikos.724976453@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <1992Dec23.065254.17977@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
  9. Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 03:47:13 GMT
  10. Lines: 17
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Dec23.065254.17977@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
  13. >>
  14. >
  15. >Can you produce any evidence that anybody is performing post-26 week
  16. >terminations and *not* attempting to salvage the fetus? So far, you've
  17. >completly failed to do this. 
  18.  
  19. Okay, Mark, if a 28-week pregnant woman asked for a D&E abortion, and there 
  20. were NO unusual medical conditions diagnosed, do you think, from the viewpoint
  21. of medical ethics, she should be allowed to get her D&E? After that, please
  22. answer the same question from your own personal moral viewpoint. If the two 
  23. answers differ, will you finally admit that the pseudo-proposal to "handle
  24. abortion as strictly a medical matter" is naive and unworkable, since medical
  25. ethics alone can't address the vast tapestry of legal/historical/sociological/
  26. economic factors that legislation can?
  27.  
  28.                                 - Kevin
  29.