home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53005 soc.men:21823 alt.dads-rights:3110
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!gatech!concert!duke!gazit
- From: gazit@duke.cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,soc.men,alt.dads-rights
- Subject: Re: Biological Reasons for Male Choice
- Message-ID: <725251978@lear.cs.duke.edu>
- Date: 25 Dec 92 02:52:59 GMT
- References: <BzErHD.3xA@ddsw1.mcs.com> <p0v2_p_@rpi.edu>
- Reply-To: gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel)
- Followup-To: soc.men
- Organization: Living In Harmony
- Lines: 8
-
- In article <p0v2_p_@rpi.edu> cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:
- >Self-defense? Oh, I think it sounds rather more like a petulant little
- >boy stomping his foot and whining "If I can't have any candy then YOU
- >CAN'T EITHER!" as he throws his sister's lollipop into the dirt.
-
- And the anti-choice-for-men feminists (e.g. Michal and Adrienne)
- behave like little bullies that shout "my candies are protected,
- so I can throw your to the dirt."
-