home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!taco!csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu!dsholtsi
- From: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Subject: Re: A Bare-Fased misrepresentation in same sentence
- Message-ID: <1992Dec24.181531.5792@ncsu.edu>
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Organization: North Carolina State University
- References: <1992Dec23.212832.10957@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <34614@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> <1992Dec24.033906.16829@ncsu.edu> <34625@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 18:15:31 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <34625@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU>
- smezias@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU (Stephen J. Mezias) writes:
- >dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
-
- >> I have stated numerous times I am undecided on the issue of
- >> legislation, but that I do oppose Roe v. Wade and the FOCA.
-
- > In the context of talk.abortion, it is incomprehensible to me that one
- > could claim to be undecided on legislative issues and opposed to FOCA.
-
- It's only incomprehensible to idiots such as yourself. I haven't
- taken a position on legislation that would restrict abortion.
-
- >> My arguments against abortion often revolve around moral
- >> issues, and they should not be confused with arguments in
- >> favor of legal restrictions.
-
- > Last time I checked deliberate misrepresentation and lying were
- > generally considered immoral.
-
- Well, that makes you extremely immoral, doesn't it?
-
- > Is that a clue about how to
- > characterize your side of the issue?
-
- Your delusions seem to be getting worse; I'm not on any 'side'.
-
-