NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/soc/motss/54440

Internet Message Format | 1992-12-31 | 1.7 KB

From: [e-mail] (John Prigeon)
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 21:20:37 GMT
Subject: Re: penis size (was Re: Muffin on Parade)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara, CA
Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpcc05!hpscit!jprigeon
Newsgroups: soc.motss
References: <[e-mail]>
Lines: 33

[e-mail] (Brent Capps) writes:

>I look at it as just another physical characteristic like h or t or w.
>The interpretation you put onto it is your own.

Not always.  Just a walk down the beach with the muscle men displaying
their sinew tells me that sometimes there's a little bit of 'self-
interpretation' going on.  That's probably true of e as well.

>Everybody thinks it's such
>a big goddam party to have a very large penis?

Yunno, that's the impression I get, too, which was in the background of my
original post.  Men of all flavors, GB and S, seem to be enraptured by
copious quantities of whatever they like.  Sitting around the lunch table
at work, I get nauseated by hearing the straight men degrading women by
discussing 'jugs', 'knockers', 'pom-poms', etc, as if that were most
important part of a woman.  I've also been privy to gay male conversations
where the same kind of degradation was occuring, and I found it just as
distasteful.

On the other hand, I've seen magazine reports that say that women (straight)
consider the size of their lover's p-p 5th or 6th down the list of
attractiveness, after sense of humor, personality, and other physical
not-directly-sexual stuff.  Seeing this kind of report increases my respect
for women's perspicacity.

BTW, Brent, I've got a rocket in my pocket, too.  Wanna get together?

snicker-snicker,
jap
;^)