home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!goofy!mumbo.apple.com!gallant.apple.com!mcmelmon.apple.com!user
- From: mattm@apple.com (Matthew Melmon)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Subject: Re: Changing standards of female beauty (was Re: Ageism)
- Message-ID: <mattm-231292173402@mcmelmon.apple.com>
- Date: 24 Dec 92 01:47:43 GMT
- References: <1992Dec23.165203.58966@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> <1992Dec23.194112.15834@spdcc.com> <mattm-231292130250@mcmelmon.apple.com> <1haug6INN9tj@mizar.usc.edu>
- Sender: news@gallant.apple.com
- Followup-To: soc.motss
- Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1haug6INN9tj@mizar.usc.edu>, adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson)
- wrote:
-
- [etc, etc]
-
- You see the problem, DLM? Even when I *say* "half humorous" - it
- is not readily apparent to even the better educated twits that
- what follows is not necessarily to be taken at face value.
-
- I think, however, that a casual jaunt through Vogue, et. al. during
- the period in question would reveal a strong androgynist bent.
- What does an androgynous woman look like? No chest, little
- variation from chest to waist to hips. Short, simple hairstyle.
- And, of course, no body fur.
-
- A 13 year old boy.
-
- *X*
-