home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!autodesk!owen
- From: owen@autodesk.com (D. Owen Rowley)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Subject: Re: Dworkin (was Re: Liberty)
- Message-ID: <18223@autodesk.COM>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 01:25:18 GMT
- References: <1h6t87INNccf@mizar.usc.edu> <1992Dec22.144024.28676@tc.cornell.edu> <1992Dec22.172912.2724@tc.cornell.edu>
- Sender: news@Autodesk.COM
- Lines: 95
-
- Knowing full well that I am In Melindas kill file, and that past
- interactions between us have been rather heated, I need to write this
- anyway.
-
- In article <1992Dec22.172912.2724@tc.cornell.edu>, shore@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda Shore) writes:
- > In article <1h7hkdINNeuu@mizar.usc.edu> adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
- > >In article <1992Dec22.144024.28676@tc.cornell.edu>
- > >shore@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda Shore) writes:
- > >> While I certainly disagree with Dworkin, that won't stop me
- > >> from disagreeing with you about her. Her suggestion that
- > >> true consensuality can't exist between two people where
- > >> there is a gross power imbalance is a valid one.
- >
- > >If I thought that were her point, I would of course agree
- > >with her.
-
- > And how do you think she arrived at her conclusions? Andrea
- > Dworkin writes that all heterosexual sex is rape because ...
- > Because what? What are the arguments she presents (without
- > an ad hominem attack, if you please)?
-
- I haven't read the material so cannot answer this part, but I'm leaving it
- here for continuity.
-
- > A thing I like about Andrea Dworkin is that she pisses off
- > men so thoroughly. Men (notably straight white men) are so
- > rarely the object of complete dehumanization. I don't think
- > that turnabout is fair play, but I do feel that reading
- > Dworkin could lead more men to the "Aha!" experience. Mind
- > you, all too many who do read Dworkin don't think about
- > it beyond being simply outraged, but maybe some encouragement
- > to consider why they're so angry at Andrea Dworkin could
- > result in a better understanding of what it is to be a
- > woman or minority in this culture, and how it might feel
- > to live as the object of this kind of hate, day in and day
- > out.
-
- this kind of bitterness upsets me.
- Not because it affects me personally in any way, but because the empathic
- part of me, the part my ascii pals don't get to know until they become
- real world pals, feels the pungent sting of these words on the pallette.
-
- In the paragraph of yours above you say that it pleases you that Andrea
- Dworkin pisses men off, and objectifys them in a dehumanising way.
- You go on to rationalise that by saying that you think it will help
- them get their heads straight about the way they treat women and make
- changes accordingly.
-
- There is something about this that doesn't ring true to me.
- The way you end the paragraph is revealing I think.
- It sure sounds like spite to me.
-
- This way of being, bitter and spitefull, is a loosers game Melinda.
- Regret isn't worth the time spent on it, but besides being worthless
- bitterness is really the punishment one would like to inflict on the
- trangressor, kept chained to ones side and applied to ones-self.
-
- You may think that I am being mean in saying this, but despite our
- political differences I wouldn't wish this state upon you.
-
- Do you think that men who rape, and I mean the men who just don't
- give a fuck about the recipient of their violence, are affected one
- iota by the writing of Andrea Dworkin? If such a man was made aware of
- her positions it would not dehumanize him at all. Such a man might feel
- empowered that he was the kind of person who had so thoroughly broken
- this women down to such a vengefull bitter reaction. For reaction it must
- be, I cannot imagine a human being coming into this existence with
- such bitterness inate.
-
- Andrea Dworkin is not getting even, she is validating the power-over
- relationship that passes for *love* in our society.
-
- I suppose that men who are socialy responsible enough to understand the
- concept that *no means no* might be moved to sadness by the display of
- her rage, but such negative methodology does not lend itself well to
- positive results.
-
- It seems to perpetuate the cycle, it seems to
- give energy and strength to the negativity of the issue.
-
- It seems to me that some clear thought about goals and how best to achieve
- them is a lot better use of time than hanging onto the roll of hate-object
- and squeezing bitter tears from the memory of past injustice.
-
- I truly hope that this posting was just a flare set off by some triggering
- mechanism, I truly hope that this is not indicative of a deeper more
- persistent pain.
-
- LUX ./. owen
-
- --
- D. Owen Rowley {uunet,fernwood,sun}!autodesk!owen
-
- " It will be a cold March 17th that I celebrate the imposition of
- Romes rule, on Pagan Ireland. Erin go ppphhhhhttttttt! "
-