home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.college:5857 alt.usage.english:9896
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!edcastle!edcogsci!iad
- From: iad@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Ivan A Derzhanski)
- Newsgroups: soc.college,alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: They (was Re: Shaking people up with "she"? (was Re: Sexist language))
- Message-ID: <12189@kesson.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 13:47:49 GMT
- References: <1992Dec19.181833.22444@cdf.toronto.edu> <BzJtDr.D3I@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <BzMIqJ.3r9@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <BzMuyJ.FyD@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
- Organization: Centre for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh, UK
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <BzMuyJ.FyD@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> mmmirash@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Mandar M. Mirashi) writes:>
- >In article <BzMIqJ.3r9@ccu.umanitoba.ca> ens@ccu.umanitoba.ca () writes:
- >>Few people object to
- >>"Someone's been eating my porridge, and they've eaten it all up."
- >
- >And few would object to :
- >"Someone's been eating my porridge, and he or she has eaten it all up."
- >
- >Both usages are acceptable, though the latter is grammatically correct.
-
- Incidentally, the latter sounds more artificial to me, because it
- involves the artifact "he or she". I don't use the former, but I
- think it is by far the more natural construction.
-
- And as far as grammaticality goes, apparent violation of number
- agreement is a pretty common thing, particularly in British English,
- where singular collective nouns frequently trigger plural agreement.
-
- --
- `D'ye mind tellin me whit the two o ye are gaun oan aboot?' (The Glasgow
- Ivan A Derzhanski (iad@cogsci.ed.ac.uk; iad@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu) Gospel)
- * Centre for Cognitive Science, 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, UK
- * Cowan House, Pollock Halls, 18 Holyrood Park Road, Edinburgh EH16 5BD, UK
-