home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.college:5830 alt.usage.english:9816
- Newsgroups: soc.college,alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!psgrain!hippo!ford.ee.up.ac.za!pchayest.unisa.ac.za!hayesstw
- From: hayesstw@risc1.unisa.ac.za (Steve Hayes)
- Subject: Re: Sexist language
- Sender: news@ford.ee.up.ac.za (NetNews Daemon)
- Message-ID: <hayesstw.150.724935392@risc1.unisa.ac.za>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 10:56:33 GMT
- Lines: 16
- References: <1992Dec14.002848.29714@Princeton.EDU> <1ggp8rINNivb@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1992Dec14.044024.22225@Princeton.EDU> <1992Dec14.061313.5784@Princeton.EDU> <1992Dec16.103211.10829@vax.oxford.ac.uk>
- Organization: University of South Africa
-
- In article <1992Dec16.103211.10829@vax.oxford.ac.uk> wilcox@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
-
- >Why not use the non-sexist term which has been current in the UK for a while:
- >Freshers. It has that semi-derogatory connotation, it can easily be said with a
- >sneer and its compounds (Freshers' Fair, Freshers' Bop et al) roll easily off
- >the tongue.
-
- Non-sexist?
-
- When I was a first-year student, many years ago, there were freshers and
- freshettes.
-
- Steve Hayes, Department of Missiology & Editorial Department
- Univ. of South Africa, P.O. Box 392, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa
- Internet: hayesstw@risc1.unisa.ac.za
- steve.hayes@f20.n7101.z5.fidonet.org
-