home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!news.ccs.queensu.ca!qucdn!saundrsg
- Organization: Queen's University at Kingston
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 14:01:56 EST
- From: Graydon <SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>
- Message-ID: <93001.140156SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>
- Newsgroups: soc.bi
- Subject: Re: Purity
- References: <1993Jan1.014238.17022@netcom.com>
- <93001.010248SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> <1993Jan1.083649.13361@netcom.com>
- Lines: 38
-
- Getting to be too much to quote.
-
- My favourite, if grammatically incorrect, response to 'what are you?'
- questions is 'a people'. If they stop blinking after 5 seconds or
- don't scream at you for being a wiseass you're probably ok.
-
- If I can be semantically fussy, Jeff, the problem is *not* that you're
- being issued with a label, it's that you're being chucked into a bin
- (presumably the bin labeled 'bi'). The bin has a contents list on
- the front; for many people, the list includes things like 'an even more
- depraved instance of Them', 'morally deficent', or even 'will try
- anything once'. This list is a cultural artifact most of the time;
- hunting down and closely examining all of these lists is a lot of work,
- and most people don't bother to do it.
-
- If people really *did* use labels, and didn't make assumptions when
- assigning the labels, we'd be a lot better off. For example, I can
- put a label on the (very small) memory node marked 'things I know
- about Jeff' that says 'presently considers himself bi'. This says
- almost nothing about what you are actually interested in; it could be
- mostly guys with tatoos and long black beards, it could be mostly
- women who are frequently gowned in mystic samite white, or it could
- be something I'm (vanilla person that I am) never going to imagine.
-
- Changing one's habits of thought to sort-by-label rather than
- to assign-a-bin-and-check-the-contents-list is work, lots of it.
- Most lesbigay people I've met have had to make at least some of
- this change because they're faced with the contents list for
- the bin they're supposed to be in and their self perception, and
- the two don't match at all.
-
- The other thing is that sticking people in bins works just fine
- in fairly homogeneous enviroments, which most eviroments are.
- It leads to a narrow view of the world and no good poetry known to
- me. (which last is a significant condemnation.)
-
-
- Graydon
-