home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!nwnexus!ole!rwing!fylz!eskimo!jammer
- From: jammer@eskimo.com (Lyle Harwood)
- Newsgroups: seattle.general
- Subject: Re: Why CAN'T people drive 55?!
- Message-ID: <1993Jan1.015505.13365@eskimo.com>
- Date: 1 Jan 93 01:55:05 GMT
- References: <1992Dec31.175557.1396@Celestial.COM>
- Organization: -> ESKIMO NORTH (206) For-Ever <-
- Lines: 61
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
-
- Bill Campbell (bill@Celestial.COM) wrote:
- : In <1992Dec30.194123.24106@eskimo.com> alpinist@eskimo.com (David Butler) writes:
- :
- : :In article <1849@rwing.UUCP> pat@rwing.UUCP (Pat Myrto) writes:
- : :>Harold - don't you recall that the DESIGN speed limit was 70 when the
- : :>freeways were made? The 55 speed limit was imposed supposedly to reduce
- : :>fuel consumption (something that it does not do in more than a few cars).
- :
- : :It's been a while since I've seen the statistics but there is a big
- : :correlation between speed and gas consumption. It is a lot more than
- : :just a few cars.
- :
- : It depends on the car's design and setup. I had a Lotus Elan
- : with a Broadspeed prepared Cosworth BDA Engine which was most
- : efficient at 80MPH. Below that I had to be in 3rd gear :-).
- :
- : :>A reduction (temporary, mostly) in accidents and fatalities was a spin
- : :>off.
- :
- : :The state insurance commisioner issued a report a couple years back showing
- : :a large correlation between increased gas prices and reduced number of
- : :accidents. The theory being that when gas prices are up people both drive
- : :less and drive more carefully to get better mileage which reduces the chance
- : :of getting into an accident.
- :
- : The real reason for the drop was that the lower speed limits and
- : limited driving resulting from the gas ``shortage'' (it was
- : amazing that getting gas wasn't a problem once I got 100 miles
- : from Washington D.C. where the politicians could see the
- : problems). People were driving far fewer miles during this time
- : so fewer accidents/fatalities. The significant numbers are the
- : accidents/fatalities per million miles driven.
- :
- : .......
- : :> Incidentally, a side effect of driving to not be noticed,
- : :>keeping the intervals open, etc., not only is enhanced safety, but lower
- : :>insurance rates (not a trivial consideration these days). The cost of
- : :>liability, collision, comp, etc. can be enough to give anybody a coronary.
- :
- : :Actually this isn't true. The car that isn't noticed is more likely to
- : :be hit. The most common excuse for an accident is "I didn't even see him".
- : :I don't know statistics on the color of cars and tickets, but I do know that
- : :red cars are statistically less likely to get into an accident than any other
- : :color - the theory being that they are easier to see. Likewise drab colors
- : :(Tan and black) are more likely to get into accidents.
- : :
- : Red cars are much more likely to receive tickets too,
- : particularly red sports cars.
- :
- : I agree with the visibility issue. My solution (I drive a tan
- : Subaru Legacy wagon) is keep the headlights on all the time. The
- : lights turn off automatically when the ignition is off (makes
- : much more sense than starting some stupid chime :-) so I don't
- : have to worry about running the battery down.
- :
- : Bill
- : --
- : INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software
- : UUCP: ...!thebes!camco!bill 6641 East Mercer Way
- : uunet!camco!bill Mercer Island, WA 98040; (206) 947-5591
- : SPEED COSTS MONEY -- HOW FAST DO YOU WANT TO GO?
-