home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: seattle.general
- Path: sparky!uunet!nwnexus!seanews!fylz!uw-warp!news.u.washington.edu!monaghan
- From: monaghan@cac.washington.edu (Tracy Monaghan )
- Subject: Re: Does anyone read Seattle PI today?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.175059.21946@u.washington.edu>
- Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: UW Computing
- References: <1992Dec18.063624.27536@u.washington.edu> <4135@phred.UUCP>
- Distribution: seattle
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 17:50:59 GMT
- Lines: 44
-
- In article <4135@phred.UUCP> harryb@phred.UUCP writes:
- >
- >
- >Adam, I understand your outrage. But stop and think: The US "media"
- >conceived of, worked hard for, and brought you, live into your very
- >living room, TA-DAH: *The LA RIOTS*. They orchestrated it, they
- >called for it, and they presided over the destruction. Do you
- >seriously think they really give a damn about accuracy? THEY DON'T
- >HAVE TO. "Wow, $750 million damage and over 50 killed! Why, there's
- >no LIMIT to our power!"
- >
- >The "dethroning" of President Nixon in 1974 made them aware of the
- [snip,snip]
- >Travesty of November 3rd, the consequences of which are still to come.
- >The drum beat to eliminate private ownership of firearms is increasing
- >to a crescendo and will continue to increase in volume until they
- [snip,snip]
- >
- >***GUN CONTROL == PEOPLE CONTROL***
- >
- [snip,snip]
- >AND THEY, THE MEDIA, ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO NO ONE. THERE IS NOTHING IN
- >OUR SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES TO CHECK OR BALANCE THEM.
- >
- >This example you gave is but one example which appears to you
- >egregious. Trust NONE of the information fed to you by the media. And
- [snip,snip]
- >
- >IMHO, every act, EVERY ACT, of the US media is skewed (and has been,
- [snip,snip]
- >used-to-be Socialist World is collapsing economically and admitting
- >that the principles of collectivism are incompatible with human rights
- >and human government, and the US Liberal Left, using its mouthpiece,
- >The Media, is trying to segue into it right here and now, and world
- >wide, if they can get away with it. Sigh.
- >
- >And US citizens, an "intelligentsia"? You're joking. Right? RIGHT?
- >You mean that THIS is what Thomas Jefferson had in mind when he spoke
- >of an "educated electorate"? :-)
-
-
- Oh, my. I was not aware that Lyndon LaRouche had access to the Internet
-
- #include /etc/.smiley
-