home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!aws
- From: aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer)
- Subject: Re: SSTO vs 2 stage
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.182843.7749@iti.org>
- Organization: Evil Geniuses for a Better Tomorrow
- References: <ewright.725755862@convex.convex.com> <1992Dec31.015157.14864@cs.rochester.edu> <ewright.725820847@convex.convex.com>
- Distribution: sci
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 18:28:43 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <ewright.725820847@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
-
- >Now, please point out to me where my analogy is flawed.
-
- I do't think it is flawed so much as missing the point. The point is to
- reduce the cost of access to LEO. Bruce's ideas to me seem well thought out
- and practical. It cuts costs and reduces risk which is all that matters.
-
- I agree with you that SSTO will eventually be the solution (at least the
- way it looks now). That doesn't preclude other options which cut costs and
- reduce risk as stepping stones leading in that direction.
-
- Allen
-
- --
- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | Allen W. Sherzer | "A great man is one who does nothing but leaves |
- | aws@iti.org | nothing undone" |
- +----------------------114 DAYS TO FIRST FLIGHT OF DCX----------------------+
-