home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!convex!convex!ewright
- From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
- Subject: Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements (was Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX?
- Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account)
- Message-ID: <ewright.725669819@convex.convex.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 22:56:59 GMT
- References: <1992Dec28.172953.26161@ke4zv.uucp> <ewright.725647230@convex.convex.com> <1992Dec29.200444.11917@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bach.convex.com
- Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
- X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
- Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
- not necessarily those of CONVEX.
- Lines: 41
-
- In <1992Dec29.200444.11917@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> hack@arabia.uucp (Edmund Hack) writes:
-
- >How do they have to pay except for copying costs? Certain parts of the
- >shuttle design may be either classified (i.e. the comm crypto gear) or
- >proprietary (some of the COTS equipment), but the bulk is available for
- >copying costs. If I want a copy of the schematics, I find a copying
- >cost charge reasonable.
-
- You can get a copy of a government patent for copying charges,
- yes. You can get a copy of *anybody's* patent for copying charges.
- But if you use it without paying royalties, you're in big trouble.
-
- Do you find legal costs reasonable also? ;-)
-
- If you don't believe this, look at a publication called NASA
- Tech Briefs. It contains brief descriptions of NASA patents
- that are available *for licensing*, along with instructions
- on who to contact if you want to license them.
-
- Software developed by NASA is available from the COSMIC information
- service. I am told the cost for these programs typically runs several
- thousands per tape. Do you believe that this is a copying charge?
-
-
- >Please cite the _exact_ basis for this statement, i.e. the part of the
- >U.S. Code or the appropriations laws that make it illegal to fabricate
- >things. Either that or be more careful in your flaming. Accusing NASA
- >of illegal acts without basis is impolite at the minimum.
-
- The applicable law is the NASA Act. It charters the agency to conduct
- research and development. Period. Not to build and operate a national
- transportation system. It is illegal for government agencies to conduct
- unauthorized activities.
-
-
- >Also, this thread has gone about as far as it can go. Please save
- >bandwidth and disk wear and tear and _drop it_. Please.
-
- Your concern for wear and tear is touching. Almost as much as
- your desire to get in the last the last word. ;-)
-
-