home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a752
- From: Bruce_Dunn@mindlink.bc.ca (Bruce Dunn)
- Subject: Re: Acceleration, cats
- Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
- Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 18:06:59 GMT
- Message-ID: <18890@mindlink.bc.ca>
- Sender: news@deep.rsoft.bc.ca (Usenet)
- Lines: 37
-
- > John Roberts writes:
- >
- > I've read that small children often survive long falls with surprisingly
- > little injury. It was speculated that they may be more likely to relax
- > than adults.
- >
-
-
- I think that the main cause of differences in the ability of
- different creatures to survive falls is our old friend, the square cube law:
-
- Count a child as having half the linear dimensions of an adult.
- Relative to an adult, the "squash room" available for deacceleration is
- related to the linear dimension (1/2 of an adult). If children had the same
- body plan as adults, a "half adult size" child would have a mass proportional
- to her volume, which is proportional to the cube of her linear dimensions ---
- the child would have a mass of 1/2*1/2*1/2 = 1/8 of the adult (real kids hare
- probably heavier than this due to the relatively larger sizes of their heads
- in the overall body plan).
-
- Stored energy in a falling body is proportional to mass. The child
- thus has 1/2 the distance for deacceleration, but 1/8 the energy to get rid
- of by deformation etc.
-
- Mice do quite well when dropped a few meters. Dropping an elephant
- the same distance would probably create an insurance writeoff. The
- difference is related to body size, not the special body defences that cats
- have in addition to their natural size protection (I wouldn't want to drop my
- pet lion from the balcony of a 10th story apartment).
-
-
-
-
-
-
- --
- Bruce Dunn Vancouver, Canada Bruce_Dunn@mindlink.bc.ca
-