home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!well!sarfatti
- From: sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us (Jack Sarfatti)
- Subject: re: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
- Message-ID: <C01D72.1yx@well.sf.ca.us>
- Sender: news@well.sf.ca.us
- Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 19:37:50 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
-
- " I always am amused at calls for greater signal/noise ratio in
- signalless posts. 'Discussion' is caused by people discussing.
- Feel free to do so. However, even this is not quite as amusing as
- a) the assertion that Sarfatti's postings constitute 'the _only_
- postings
- in this group which have tackled advanced theoretical ideas',
- b) Sarfatti has been somehow reticent about telling us about his
- 'work',
- c) The 'wierdnesses' of QM experimentation have somehow not
- been discussed here,
- d) Sarfatti is positively affecting the 'S/N ratio',
-
- I guess you must have missed Sarfatti's 500-part series on
- Gleick's new book on Feynman, including excerpts from probably nearly
- every page. Give him half a chance and I'm sure he would be
- more than willing to flood your mailbox with postings on his
- 'work'.
-
- Now where did I put that electronic copy of Heaviside's papers?
- Part 5006: Heaviside does London ...
-
- dale bass "
- This is simply ugly - and is the sort of thing that I hope would not be
- permitted in a moderated conference. Bass is green with envy.
-