home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!agate!overload.lbl.gov!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!beta.lanl.gov!mwj
- From: mwj@beta.lanl.gov (William Johnson)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Reluctant call moder(and sci.physics.research-NOT!)
- Summary: Come on, man: Can't you read? <FLAME WARNING>
- Message-ID: <1992Dec24.172437.7698@newshost.lanl.gov>
- Date: 24 Dec 92 17:24:37 GMT
- References: <D0s0VB1w165w@sys6626.bison.mb.ca> <1992Dec24.074121.11426@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <SRCTRAN.92Dec24112819@world.std.com>
- Sender: news@newshost.lanl.gov
- Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
- Lines: 24
-
- I wouldn't bother responding to this were it not for the fear that the
- ignorance expressed may be widespread ...
-
- An author who will go unnamed writes:
-
- >Thus, my pitch to keep sci.physics as is and unmoderated.
-
- For the umpteenth time, NOBODY in the current thread is suggesting changes to
- sci.physics itself!! Have you actually *read* the postings about a moderated
- group? What's being discussed is a *NEW* group, sci.physics.research (or
- s.p.moderated or whatever) that will *coexist* with the unmoderated sci.physics
- as it currently exists, not replace it. Sci.physics will undoubtedly careen
- onward as a venue for general public/New Theories/entertainment/whatever, just
- as it should, while the moderated group goes off in its own, hopefully less
- noisy direction.
-
- Please try to do a better job of understanding what's proposed before stating
- an opinion on it!
-
- --
- Bill Johnson | My suggestion for an Official
- Los Alamos National Laboratory | Usenet Motto: "If you have nothing
- Los Alamos, New Mexico USA | to say, then come on in, this is the
- !cmcl2!lanl!mwj (mwj@lanl.gov) | place for you, tell us all about it!"
-