home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!guinness!opal.idbsu.edu!holmes
- From: holmes@opal.idbsu.edu (Randall Holmes)
- Subject: Re: Numbers and sets
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.155555.21505@guinness.idbsu.edu>
- Sender: usenet@guinness.idbsu.edu (Usenet News mail)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: opal
- Organization: Boise State University
- References: <Bzsrvt.167@umassd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 15:55:55 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <Bzsrvt.167@umassd.edu> pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU writes:
- > Is there a relationship between sets and Plato's Forms?
-
- Some people think so; that is why the popular term for mathematical
- realists is "platonists". Plato's Forms were ideal exemplars of
- mundane objects; sets do not have this character (the set of all
- natural numbers is not a perfect natural number). There is a
- relationship between sets and form with a small f (to avoid calling
- the objects of mathematics "abstract", which I think is
- epistemologically misleading, I call them formal objects), but they
- are not Forms in Plato's sense. Moreover, the use of mathematical
- objects is quite different from that of Plato's Forms.
-
-
- >================================================================================
- > "In that world, you'll be able to rise in the morning with the spirit
- >you had known in your childhood: that spirit of eagerness, adventure and cer-
- >tainty which comes from dealing with a rational universe."
- > AYN RAND
- >================================================================================
- >Stephen Grossman <PMSC13SG@UMASS.EDU>
- >================================================================================
-
-
- --
- The opinions expressed | --Sincerely,
- above are not the "official" | M. Randall Holmes
- opinions of any person | Math. Dept., Boise State Univ.
- or institution. | holmes@opal.idbsu.edu
-