home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!psgrain!hippo!shrike.und.ac.za!casper.cs.uct.ac.za!nhorne
- From: nhorne@casper.cs.uct.ac.za (N E Horne)
- Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
- Subject: Re: That which hurts
- Message-ID: <Bztz5L.DMM@casper.cs.uct.ac.za>
- Date: 25 Dec 92 19:51:21 GMT
- Article-I.D.: casper.Bztz5L.DMM
- References: <1gib6mINN76i@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> <1992Dec14.201453.17282@guinness.idbsu.edu> <1gius4INNo68@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> <1992Dec20.235407.14044@news2.cis.umn.edu> <1h4r5rINNbl@cat.cis.Brown.EDU>
- Organization: Computer Science Department, University of Cape Town
- Lines: 27
-
- Somewhere along the "Truth" thread, Jamie writes:
-
-
- " Consider the sentence which would come first on an alphabetized
- list of 100-word sentences of English.
-
- It is either a true sentence of English or a false one. No one has
- ever interpreted it (I'll wager). With the possible exception of
- one of us, no one ever will. "
-
- That something's amiss becomes clear when you consider that in the event of your
- sentence being an imperative (the requirement of alphabetic order may yield
- something like "Abandon aardvarks!" at the top of your list) or a question
- the sentence is neither true nor false.
-
- In fact, it is widely held that propositions, as opposed to sentences, are the
- bearers of truth value. The process of interpretaion involves nothing less
- than establishing a correspondence between sentences and statements (which
- also have no truth value) and if possible (and this is not possible in the
- cases mentioned above) between statements and propositions.
- Consider also what truth value you would care to assign to ambiguous sentences.
-
-
- (I don't know how helpful this is, I've missed much of the thread.)
-
- Neil Horne
- Cape Town
-