home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!ncar!noao!amethyst!organpipe.uug.arizona.edu!galileo.physics.arizona.edu!soliton.physics.arizona.edu!tinker
- From: tinker@soliton.physics.arizona.edu (Frank Tinker)
- Newsgroups: sci.optics
- Subject: Re: Spectral Resolution Question
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.145632.22858@galileo.physics.arizona.edu>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 14:56:32 GMT
- References: <1992Dec22.222316.17439@photon.com>
- Sender: tinker@physics.arizona.edu (Frank Tinker)
- Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson AZ
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1992Dec22.222316.17439@photon.com> wmc@photon.com (Bill Cornette) writes:
- >
- > I am constructing a code that calculates atmospheric propagation
- >at moderate resolution (i.e., 1 cm**-1). I have allowed the code to
- >degrade the resolution to a user-specified value using a triangular
- >function (i.e., the calculated spectral value -- transmittance, radiance --
- >is convolved with a triangular response having unit area and the full-width
- >at half-maximum equal to the desired resolution).
- > However, I would like to permit the use of other functions
- >if they are used within the community. If you use (or know others who
- >use) spectral resolution functions other than triangular, I would
- >appreciate it if you would e-mail me a description of the function and
- >any comments that you wish to make regarding its use.
- >
- >Thanks.
- >Bill C.
-
-
- Don't forget the ever-popular trapezoid response function.
-
- Frank Tinker
-