home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.military
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrhub2!ciss!law7!military
- From: Emmanuel Baechler <baechler@lia.di.epfl.ch>
- Subject: The need for an Army ( was: Swiss military preparedness?)
- Message-ID: <Bzo8u2.CBJ@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Sender: military@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Sci.Military Login)
- Organization: NCR Corporation -- Law Department
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:34:50 GMT
- Approved: military@law7.daytonoh.ncr.com
- Lines: 84
-
-
- From Emmanuel Baechler <baechler@lia.di.epfl.ch>
-
-
-
- >>There are several things to say about this. First of all, it is true that
- >>our army can be entirely mobilized in 48 hours. This may look impressive,
- >>and it was for conflicts of the past, but it is unsufficient now. We have
- >>no permanent alert forces, and modern conflicts can start so quickly, that
- >>we are no more in a good situation.
- >
- >>The second important point, is that your report has probably not shown you
- >>the very poor motivation and morale of swiss soldiers. Most young men are
- >>not motivated at all by the army, Even worse, there is a lot of anger
- >against the army, mainly because of its fundamental lack of respect of
- >people.
-
- >What you have seen is basically the propaganda of the swiss army.
-
- > I realize this may easily stray from the charter, so please
- > watch your posts. Being an avid follower of rec.guns and
- > talk.politics.guns, the Swiss model comes up frequently, but both
- > groups reference the low homicide rate, not the military aspect of an
- > armed populace. That is what I wish to discuss in this subject.
-
- I am also an avid reader of rec.guns (and a regular contributor), but
- I unsubscibed the "trahsy" talk.politics.guns newsgroups many years
- ago. Although I live in Switzlerand, I am an NRA member (and a member
- of the equivalent swiss group).
-
- I my previous posting I was not speaking at all of gun ownership. I
- was not speaking any more of politics. I was speaking of human
- relationships (and that's not politics) and of the constraint of
- modern wars.
-
- I my second paragraph, that I consider the most important, I was
- speaking of the lack of motivation and morale of the swiss soldiers.
- That's not a statement about gun ownership, that's not a political
- consideration, that's a measurable fact.
-
- It is a matter of fact that the swiss army is used to humiliate quite
- a lot its soldiers through different practices. This has caused a lot
- of anger among people (from every political side) against our army.
- That`s not new and that's admitted by almost anyone here. Our
- government is very worried by this, and it is searching a way to
- change this pretty quickly. They are especially looking at what's
- being done in this domain in Germany (there is a statement in their
- rules stating that they are here to preotect human diginity, and they
- are very strict with this, even toward their soldiers and officiers).
-
- This point is relevant to the discussion because a militia, as any other
- army, needs a legitimity. The need is even stronger in this case, because
- everyone has to be convinced that our army is legitimate and that he is
- doing the right thing by being in the army, and that this army is doing
- the right thing.
-
- It is today a measured fact that people, and especially young people, do
- no more believe that this army is doing the right thing. There is even
- a growing minority believing that it should not exist any more. A militia
- without legitimity and support from its population has more and more
- difficulties to do its job. Any project, justified or not, causes a lot
- of opponents. For example, we finally plan to change our interceptors,
- but the project has caused a so strong opposition that 500'000 signatures
- against it have been collected in less than a month. There will be a vote
- about this and its outcome does not look clear.
-
- In my first paragraph I was claiming something much simpler: militia do
- not have the degree of professionalism and the quickness of reaction
- needed by today's conflicts. A militia which needs 48 hours to mobilize
- is of little use agains an SS-18 or even a SU-27 with modern missiles.
- In addition, it is more and more difficult to edutate people to use more
- and more complex systems, which are used by professionals everywhere.
- This means that we will probably need some sort of permanent unit able
- to react immediatly at any time.
-
-
- Emmanuel Baechler. | Tel.: ++41-21-693-2732
- Laboratoire d'Intelligence Artificielle | e-mail: baechler@lia.di.epfl.ch
- Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne | or: baechler@liasun6.epfl.ch
- MA-Ecublens | Standard Disclaimer
- CH-1015 Lausanne Switzerland
-
- Ban the bomb. Save the world for conventional warfare.
-
-