home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / sci / med / nutritio / 1667 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-29  |  1.1 KB  |  37 lines
  1. Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!sasquatch!young
  3. From: young@clpd.kodak.com (Rich Young)
  4. Subject: Re: Calcium/Magnesium
  5. Message-ID: <1992Dec28.234854.16347@pixel.kodak.com>
  6. Originator: young@sasquatch
  7. Sender: news@pixel.kodak.com
  8. Reply-To: young@clpd.kodak.com
  9. Organization: Clinical Diagnostics Division, Eastman Kodak Company
  10. References: <silver.724547658@sfu.ca> <1992Dec17.040826.24011@spdcc.com> <altar.725581448@sfu.ca>
  11. Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 23:48:54 GMT
  12. Lines: 23
  13.  
  14. In article <altar.725581448@sfu.ca> altar@beaufort.sfu.ca (Ted Wayn Altar) writes:
  15. >
  16. >dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) writes:
  17.  
  18. [...]
  19.  
  20. >>You mean you'll repeat some very fringe theories of Jim Moon, eminent
  21. >>crackpot, SFU.
  22. >
  23. >Care to reveal to us exactly what eminent credentials you might
  24. >happen to have earned?
  25.  
  26. [...]
  27.  
  28. >Again, what are your credentials such that they entitle you to
  29. >resort to mere name-calling instead of discursive argumentation
  30. >and referenced facts?
  31.  
  32.     I believe he already did that which you ask in his previous rebuttal
  33.     of your interpretation of Moon's study in r.f.v.
  34.  
  35.  
  36. -Rich Young (These are not Kodak's opinions.)
  37.