home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!zurich.ai.mit.edu!ara
- From: ara@zurich.ai.mit.edu (Allan Adler)
- Subject: Sums of reciprocals
- Message-ID: <ARA.92Dec21193839@camelot.ai.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu
- Organization: M.I.T. Artificial Intelligence Lab.
- Distribution: sci
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:38:39 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
-
- Let f(n)=1/n for every positive integer n. Let x be a positive
- real number. Let g(n,x) be defined as follows:
-
- (1) g(n,x) is a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers, possibly
- a terminating sequence.
- (2) for all n, g(n,x) is the smallest integer consistent with (1)
- such that the sum of the reciprocals of g(k,x) for k=1,...,n
- does not exceed x.
-
- I have been told that if x is rational then this leads to a way of writing
- x as a finite sum of reciprocals of distinct positive integers. Let the number
- of terms in this sum be N=N(x). I have been told that N is also the number of
- terms in a minimal representation of x as a sum of reciprocals of positive
- integers allowing repetitions.
-
- Is this true and if so how or where is it proved?
-
- Allan Adler
- ara@altdorf.ai.mit.edu
-