home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.environment:13906 sci.econ:9529 sci.anthropology:1617
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!uwm.edu!ogicse!psgrain!qiclab!techbook!szabo
- From: szabo@techbook.com (Nick Szabo)
- Newsgroups: sci.environment,sci.econ,sci.anthropology
- Subject: Re: Development policies
- Message-ID: <BzxFn2.FIM@techbook.com>
- Date: 27 Dec 92 16:40:09 GMT
- Article-I.D.: techbook.BzxFn2.FIM
- References: <1992Dec18.164247.17939@ke4zv.uucp> <725039374snx@tillage.DIALix.oz.au>
- Organization: TECHbooks --- Public Access UNIX --- (503) 220-0636
- Lines: 51
-
- gil@tillage.DIALix.oz.au (Gil Hardwick) writes:
-
- > Some choice between incompetence and greed you offer.
-
- This statement strikes me as getting to the emotional core of the
- socialist vs. capitalist issue. I think the choice can be
- resolved as follows. The global economy is a very different milieu
- than the hunter-gatherer tribe. In the latter, people often have a
- lifelong, face-to-face relationship. They can perform altruistic
- acts with the (perhaps unconscious) assurance that such altruism
- will, more often than not, benefit kin or be reciprocated down the line.
- I'd be interested in Gil elaborating on this!
-
- The "global village", on the other hand, is a TV-generated illusion.
- We imagine that because we can see the faces and problems of people
- around the world, that we understand and them and that the altruistic
- impulses that work so well in the hunter-gatherer tribe will help
- here. But the TV camera takes in only an infinitesimal fraction of
- the world, that fraction deemed relevant to the networks and their
- customers (advertisers), and is one-way, no interaction. The real
- communication is extremely abstracted, funneled primarily through
- the popular media and the price information of markets. The popular
- media is one-way, very different than the h-g tribe but providing
- many of the illusions of the "global village". Even if the media
- were two-way, one could possibly interacted with only a tiny and
- unrepresentative fraction of the world's people in any way approaching
- that of a small community. Politics, to the extent that it can
- be globalized, is by necessity one-way; even if the system was
- democratic, votes at such a level contain practically no information.
- The market is two-way, interactive, and participated in by everybody,
- although the level of participation per agent is far from equal.
- It is also abstract, and applying ethical instincts based on face-to-face
- interaction in small communities could lead us far astray.
-
- Let's keep local ethics local, and not make false comparisons of
- the "greed" of multinational corporations in an abstract market
- to the greed of an individual in a small, face-to-face community.
- In the global economy, the rational self-interest of competitive
- market agents has demonstrated itself by far the best method for
- growing the global economy while preserving the global environment.
- Yet, when faced with a problem we always seem to first think of command
- solutions -- pass a law, regulate this, subsidize those poor people,
- ban that. That is our hunter-gatherer heritage , which often works
- when applied locally, but is often disastrous when applied to a large
- nation or globally. There are many problems to be solved; let's make
- market solutions (eg tradable pollution credits) the first solutions
- we think of and try, instead of the last.
-
-
- --
- Nick Szabo szabo@techboook.com
-