home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!sgi!cdp!ei
- From: Essential Information <ei@igc.apc.org>
- Newsgroups: sci.energy
- Date: 31 Dec 92 12:42 PST
- Subject: Re: Energy Ideas - Thermal Env.
- Sender: Notesfile to Usenet Gateway <notes@igc.apc.org>
- Message-ID: <1466300129@igc.apc.org>
- References: <1466300127@igc.apc.org>
- Nf-ID: #R:cdp:1466300127:cdp:1466300129:000:11987
- Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!ei Dec 31 12:42:00 1992
- Lines: 234
-
-
-
- WINDOWS - A NEW LOOK AT AN OLD SCENE
-
- Known as "glazing," glass areas on a building shell are a
- necessary part of a pleasant work environment. Offices with
- windows are, almost without exception, considered to be the most
- desirable. Being able to see out and to fill an office with
- natural light makes office space feel more relaxed and natural.
- Windows also provide unique opportunities to use sunlight to
- reduce lighting and heating loads. Unfortunately, most buildings
- today suffer from poor glazing design, resulting in increased
- heating and cooling loads. New design techniques and glazing
- products have been developed to use sunlight to increase building
- energy efficiency.
-
- Providing Light with Daylight
-
- Smart buildings can take advantage of sunlight to reduce their
- electricity consumption for lighting. According to the U.S.
- Department of Energy (DOE), more than 20 times the light required
- to light building interiors is available from natural sunlight.
- Conventional window placement does not take full advantage of the
- available light. Simply placing windows in outer, or perimeter,
- offices only illuminates those offices. However, direct sunlight
- which enters those windows will also increase the room
- temperature. This is helpful in winter but it adds substantially
- to cooling loads in summer. Traditionally, interior offices have
- not been lit by windows.
-
- New glazing techniques provide lighting to all offices while
- avoiding overheating from direct sunlight. These technologies
- are very cost-effective in new construction. However, the design
- techniques require integration with the building's layout and
- heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. Consequently,
- these retrofits are extremely costly. The notable exception to
- this is the replacement of inefficient windows.
-
- Atria
-
- One new building design, the atrium, provides a bright and
- pleasant central area for office buildings and also creates a
- light source for interior offices. An atrium is an area in the
- center of a building which is open from the ground floor to the
- roof and is illuminated by natural light. Interior offices with
- windows facing an atrium need lower levels of electric lighting.
-
-
- Light Shelves and Clerestories
-
- Perimeter offices may be illuminated by new window arrangements
- which admit diffused and reflected light while blocking direct
- light (which causes unwanted heating and glare). Light shelves
- project outward from windows in perimeter offices. Located about
- a third of the distance from the top of the windowthey reflect
- light through the upper portion of the window. A light-colored
- ceiling will scatter this light, illuminating the office without
- heating it. Clerestories are skylights where the glass has been
- mounted perpendicular to the roof (see photo on page two).
- Mirrors on the roof reflect light into the window and the inner
- surface of the clerestory diffuses the light and directs it
- downward into the building. The clerestory may also contain
- photocells to activate artificial lights when natural light falls
- below a certain level.
-
- New Developments
-
- Two new technologies can transport light into interior office
- spaces. The first, light "pipes," reflect sunlight along their
- length, similar to a optical fiber, and allow some light to
- escape with each reflection. These pipes are excellent light
- sources for hallways and cubicle offices. The second,
- holographic films, refract light to change its direction. A
- holographic film on a window can make light appear as if it is
- shining directly into the room regardless of the angle at which
- it strikes the window. Thus, even incidental light can be
- projected 30 feet into a hallway or office space.
-
- Controlling Heat Transfer through Windows
-
- All objects emit light at different frequencies; the hotter the
- object, the more light emitted at higher frequencies. Relatively
- cool objects, such as ourselves, sun-warmed asphalt, warm rooms
- and other objects near 80 degrees fahrenheit, primarily emit
- infrared radiation (IR), which we experience as heat. All
- objects seek a state of equal radiation; the net result of this
- radiation is that cooler objects will get warmer. Since glass is
- transparent to IR, warm rooms will lose heat through radiation in
- winter and cool rooms will absorb IR heat in summer.
-
- IR is not the only way that glass facilitates energy transfer.
- Energy may be transferred by visible light as well. When
- sunlight shines directly into a room, all of the energy
- associated with that light is absorbed by dark surfaces in a room
- (carpeting, desks, chairs, etc.). These surfaces get warm and
- radiate heat in the room. This will reduce heating loads in
- winter, but it will increase cooling loads in summer.
-
- Lastly, windows allow heat transfer by conduction. Glass has a
- very low thermal resistance. While a fiberglass-insulated wall
- typically has an R-value (a measure of thermal resistance) of 15,
- called "R-15," single-paned glass windows have R-1 or, at best,
- R-2. Thus, these windows allow warm rooms to lose heat in winter
- and cool rooms to gain heat in summer.
-
- Low-Emissivity Windows Block IR
-
- Low-emissivity (low-E) windows minimize the entrance of infrared
- radiation into a room while permitting the passage of visible
- light. Emissivity is a material property. An object with a low
- emissivity has a highly reflective surface; it neither absorbs
- nor emits radiation. A low-E window will bounce radiant heat
- back to its source; warmth in a room on a cold day will be
- trapped inside while warmth outside on a warm day will be kept
- outside. According to Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL), these
- windows cost about $2/square foot and will pay back their
- investment in two to six years, depending upon climate and energy
- costs. Low-E films may also be placed directly on existing
- windows as part of an efficiency upgrade.
-
- A new type of window, an electrochromic window, has recently been
- developed which could reduce a building~s energy costs by 30 to
- 50 percent. According to a September 29, 1992, article in the
- New York Times ("Researchers Develop ~Smart~ Window to Cut Energy
- Consumption," p. C4), the electrochromic window uses an electric
- current to react to heat and light changes. The window consists
- of seven very thin layers: the two outer layers coat the window;
- the next two layers function as positive and negative terminals
- for current flow through the window; the next two layers contain
- a metal which changes color in response to an electric current;
- and the central layer contains an ion conductor. As the two
- metals change color in response to a electric current, the amount
- and type of radiation which passes through the window may be
- controlled. These electrochromic windows may be placed between
- two panes of glass to increase further the insulating value of
- the window.
-
- Casting Shadows Can Also Save Energy
-
- Light-blocking structures can prevent the entrance of direct
- sunlight through windows. Exterior blinds prevent light from
- striking a building during the day (though that eliminates the
- view). According to Energy & Economics: Strategies for Office
- Building Design (see Resources, page seven), these blinds add
- very little to the construction cost of a building (less than 1
- percent) and can reduce energy consumption by 10 percent. At a
- modeled cost of $60,000, the estimated payback time for a
- 60,000-square-foot building is six years. Other less expensive
- devices, such as awnings, may be more cost-effective, depending
- upon their effectiveness at blocking direct sunlight. Exterior
- window plants provide shade in summer and allow sunlight in
- winter. Interior blinds are not as effective in preventing heat
- gain, since the heat has already passed through the window before
- it strikes the blind, though they can prevent heat loss at night
- in cold climates.
-
- Improving Window R-Values
-
- The thermal resistance of windows may be improved by adding panes
- of glass and by filling the space between the panes with a
- non-conducting gas. Multi-paned or storm windows filled with an
- inert gas (such as xenon, krypton or argon gas have an R-value (a
- measurement of thermal resistance) of R-6.
- Windows may also have "aerogel" placed between the individual
- panes. Aerogel is a solid and transparent material made of
- nearly pure silica which contains millions of microscopic air
- cavities. These cavities increase the resistance of the
- material. Just one-half inch of aerogel between two panes of
- glass can increase the R-value of a window by 500 percent, making
- a window more resistant to heat conduction than a wall.
-
- CASE STUDIES:
-
- Mt. Airy Public Library, North Carolina
- In 1982, the town commissioners of Mt. Airy, North Carolina,
- sought to construct a library which would consume 70 percent less
- energy than a conventional building. By using clerestories
- across the top of the library, the building provides glare-free,
- diffuse light to all corners of the library without allowing the
- stacks to be directly illuminated, thereby preventing damage to
- the books from sunlight. The building design also incorporates
- insulation and air lock areas (see pages 5-6) and a zoned system
- of heat pumps. Electricity used for lighting accounts for only
- one-eighth of the energy consumption in the building. The
- library uses 90 percent less energy than the Mt. Airy City Hall,
- a building of comparable size (about 13,000 square feet). The
- construction cost was $88 per square foot as compared to $79 per
- square foot for a conventional building, but was within the range
- of other innovative and uniquely-designed libraries. After
- construction, the library was found to use 53 percent less energy
- that was estimated for a conventional design. (Contact: Ralph
- Cooke, 838 Cross Creek Drive, Mt. Airy, NC 27030).
-
- Abrams Elementary School in Bessemer, Alabama
- In designing a replacement for a condemned elementary school, the
- Board of Education in Bessemer made quick energy-saving
- adjustments to conventional designs. Since heating and lighting
- account for almost 70 percent of the energy used in a typical
- elementary school, the school was designed with modified
- clerestories. These shine light directly onto water-filled
- plastic pipes placed in the ceilings of the school~s 20 hexagonal
- teaching areas. These tubes intercept and diffuse light. Other
- energy-saving measures led to the construction of a building
- which consumes 60 percent less energy than a similar, non-solar
- building. (Contact: Stuart Wells, Passive Solar Industries
- Council, 1511 K Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005,
- (202) 371-0537.)
- Elementary Schools in Laveen, Arizona
- As a part of a major energy retrofit, in 1991, Laveen replaced
- inefficient, leaking aluminum windows in one school with a glass
- block window wall system. The project also added insulation to
- the roofs and walls of the building. The school superintendent
- reported that the improvements in the quality of lighting, air
- distribution, air temperature and noise level in buildings has
- improved the learning environment. The projects were repeated in
- two additional buildings in the summer of 1992. (Contact: Dennis
- Umber and Associates, 5535 Osborn Road, Suite 203, Scottsdale, AZ
- 85251 (602) 423-8474.)
-
- Office Complex in Southfield, Michigan
- In 1992, The Northland Towers Office Complex added a blue low-E
- film to the outside of 39,000 square feet of window space on
- their two towers. The previous film on their glass, which
- accounts for 90 percent of the building~s exterior, had begun to
- peel. The project cost $69,960. While reflective film lowers
- the cooling load in summer, it increases the heating load in the
- winter because the reflective film prevents sunlight from
- entering and warming rooms. The net annual savings are
- estimated at $22,571, resulting in a payback of 2.8 years.
- (Contact: Chris Pedigo, Executive Vice-President, Northland
- Towers Management, 15565 Northland Drive, Suite 510 West,
- Southfield, MI 48075, (313) 569-3180.)
-
-
-