home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!darkstar!steinly
- From: steinly@topaz.ucsc.edu (Steinn Sigurdsson)
- Newsgroups: sci.energy
- Subject: Re: Flywheel batteries as EV power source
- Message-ID: <STEINLY.92Dec22144421@topaz.ucsc.edu>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 22:44:21 GMT
- References: <1992Dec15.194558.2556@adobe.com> <olsen.42.725052409@vetmed.cvm.uiuc.edu>
- <51697@seismo.CSS.GOV>
- Followup-To: sci.energy
- Organization: Lick Observatory/UCO
- Lines: 57
- NNTP-Posting-Host: topaz.ucsc.edu
- In-reply-to: stead@skadi.CSS.GOV's message of 22 Dec 92 22:09:59 GMT
-
- In article <51697@seismo.CSS.GOV> stead@skadi.CSS.GOV (Richard Stead) writes:
-
- In article <olsen.42.725052409@vetmed.cvm.uiuc.edu>, olsen@vetmed.cvm.uiuc.edu (Aart_Olsen) writes:
- > In article <77846@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> mwilson@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM
- > >In <olsen.32.724613003@vetmed.cvm.uiuc.edu> olsen@
- > >|In article <BzEsw7.57B@cs.uiuc.edu> morrison@cs.uiuc.edu
- > >|>1) Slow down the rate of energy dumping. ...
-
- > >|This is what laboratory ultracentrifuges do. Usually the rotor housing
- > >|is contained in a thick bronze casing which "slowly" absorbs the kinetic
- > >|energy. I once heard an ultracentrifuge blow, and it sounded like a freight
- > >|train for maybe five minutes. Lab centrifuges contain a surprising
- > >|amount of energy--even though they have relatively small rotors and big
-
- > >Do you happen to know how much one of the little beasties weighs.
-
- > Ultracentrifuge rotors weigh about 2-4 Kg. They are maybe 15 cm diameter,
- > spin at 60-80KRPM. I think the best of them these days develop 800 kilo-
- > gravities at the tube ends (the tubes fit in the rotor). They are the best
- > technology around, by the way; they are about as massive and rotate as fast
- > as current metallurgy reliably allows.
-
- Ok now the energy -
-
- so T = 0.5 * 0.4 * 4 kg * 0.15 m * 0.15 m * (2 * pi * 80000 * 60 1/s)^2
- T = 1.26 MJ
-
- This is the limit of metallurgical technology, and now someone is claiming
- 400 times this energy? I doubt it. (400 MJ minimum is required to
- satisfy the claims of the flywheel battery people).
-
- Also, the bronze casing only has to absorb 1/400 th the energy. take them
- 2 gallons of gasoline for the 400 MJ fuel air bomb, 1/400th is about 1/2 oz
- of gasoline - about a teaspoon. It'll make a good bang (the freight train?)
- but can be contained. To look at it another way, this energy is only
- sufficient to melt less than a pound of steel. I'm sure that centrifuge
- is quite warm when you open it up after such a failure, but there is
- so much mass (8 pounds in the rotor alone) that you won't come close to
- melting anything.
-
- Actually, I think housing failure is not uncommon in ultracentrifuges,
- it kills grad students with some regularity. Apparently you can often
- hear them go wobbly though and run for it... of course they ain't cheap
- either. (Hey, can you imagine quality control at the flywheel factory!
- Make them spin each wheel up to 110% of rated spin, through several
- cycles... ;-)
-
- Now, I've asked this several times before, does anyone know
- the claimed Q for these beasties? If they're are as good as
- the best mesoscopic physical systems I know of they should discharge
- significantly over a weekend - somewhat of a problem for a family
- commuter car, puts a pretty steep overhead on keeping the tank full.
-
- * Steinn Sigurdsson Lick Observatory *
- * steinly@lick.ucsc.edu "standard disclaimer" *
- * Some people think they're really clever *
- * Smash your head against the wall Specials, 1979 *
-