home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / rec / video / 15211 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-30  |  639 b   |  19 lines
  1. Newsgroups: rec.video
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!nott!emr1!jagrant
  3. From: jagrant@emr1.emr.ca (John Grant)
  4. Subject: digital video camcorders? 
  5. Message-ID: <1992Dec30.164327.13646@emr1.emr.ca>
  6. Organization: Energy, Mines, and Resources, Ottawa
  7. Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 16:43:27 GMT
  8. Lines: 9
  9.  
  10. Why are camcorders (8mm,vhs-c,etc) still analogue?  If DAT is so great,
  11. why aren't there any camcorders recording digitally (DAT or similar)?
  12. Doesn't DAT have enough bandwidth for video?  Can anyone give some numbers
  13. for the equivalent bandwiths?
  14.  
  15. -- 
  16. John A. Grant                        jagrant@emr1.emr.ca
  17. Airborne Geophysics
  18. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa
  19.