home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!att-out!rutgers!cbmvax!grr
- From: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins)
- Newsgroups: rec.skate
- Subject: Re: Wheel lore
- Message-ID: <38222@cbmvax.commodore.com>
- Date: 31 Dec 92 06:07:55 GMT
- References: <1992Dec29.042346.20453@serval.net.wsu.edu> <C01Apx.Lt9@csn.org> <38196@cbmvax.commodore.com> <C033JA.3MJ@csn.org>
- Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins)
- Distribution: na
- Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
- Lines: 72
-
- In article <C033JA.3MJ@csn.org> pae@teal.csn.org (Phil Earnhardt) writes:
- > In article <38196@cbmvax.commodore.com> grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins) writes:
- > >In article <C01Apx.Lt9@csn.org> pae@teal.csn.org (Phil Earnhardt) writes:
- > >> A number followed by an "A" is a durometer, or rebound, rating. [...]
- > >
- > >Uh Phil... Durometer is simply "hardness", i.e. the distance the indicator
- > >plunger will depress the material with a given spring force.
- > >
- > >Simply put, rebound == bounce. High robound is generally a good thing, since
- > >the energy absorbed from impact/vibration is returned, however various
- > >additives might be needed for durability which would detract from the
- > >rebound.
- > >
- > >>Typically, for rougher road surfaces, you'd like to use a lower
- > >>durometer number. [...]
- > >
- > >this is still correct anyway...
- >
- > Can you talk about the relationship between hardness and rebound? My
- > assumption was that the reason that one wanted to use 74As on rough surfaces
- > was that their rebound was *lower* than the higher-durometer wheels.
-
- I'm not sure that there is any direct relation. If you've seen one of
- those things that bounces ball bearings, you can see that even hard
- objects can give good rebound. Whether rebound really matters or not
- is a good question, testing to see if a wheel bounces would tell you
- it's "live" and not 85% clay filler, but not much more.
-
- > I guess my point is that skaters may be more concerned about the rebound than
- > the literal hardness of the wheel, even if that isn't what the durometer
- > measurment is directly reporting.
-
- Could be, but hardness also matters, at least to the point of finding a
- soft enough wheel that you don't get that buzzing sensation.
-
- > Also, can you tell us what the meaning is for durometer ratings greater than
- > 100?
-
- The durometer scale is completely arbitrary, so I would suspect that someting
- like 102 or 105 simply means proportionally that much higher than the nominal
- 100 top of scale. It's not that 0 would be liquid or 100 like steel. I'll
- have to look at the picture of one of the durometers in a instrument catalog
- to see if they are actually graduated past 100.
-
- > The other Fun Fact I know about durometer, from the former head of R&D at
- > Kryptonics, is that the hardness of a wheel is highly temperature-sensitive.
- > A 10-degree F shift in temperature will radically change the performance/
- > handling characteristics of wheels.
-
- I would expect this to be the case of any plastic, though you'd need a chart
- to relate the temperature to the change in physical properties.
-
- > Finally, Kryptonics has a disclaimer on its new wheels warning people that
- > polyurethane wheels are not intended for speeds over 30MPH. Does anyone know
- > anything about this? What is their concern, or is this a fiat to avoid
- > liability? If nobody knows, I'll ask around...
-
- Hard to say. It could be the point at which the wheel starts to show the
- effect of centrifugal force, but more likely it's just a notion of what
- constitutes a maximum skating speed where might fall without a guarantee
- of serious injury.
-
- In some cases, the manfacturer of any part of the equipment could be named
- in an injury lawsuit, even if it appeared that the injury was due to user
- error. Such suits are often tossed out, but "rating" their wheels for use
- not to exceed 30 MPH could be an intended first line of legal defense, not
- to mention a simple safety warning.
-
- --
- George Robbins - now working for, work: to be avoided at all costs...
- but no way officially representing: uucp: {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
- Commodore, Engineering Department domain: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com
-